Browse
Search
BEAG Meeting Summary 072421
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
BOCC Elections Advisory Group
>
Minutes/Summaries
>
2021
>
BEAG Meeting Summary 072421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2021 12:23:44 PM
Creation date
8/2/2021 12:23:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/24/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOCC Elections Advisory Group 07222021
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\BOCC Elections Advisory Group\Agendas\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> the County and is in need of reclamation. Group Co-Chair Hazirjian seconded the motion. <br /> Group Co-Chair Mulkey asked Mr. Wilder to call the names of Group members for voting <br /> purposes. Group members voted by roll call on the motion, and the motion was approved <br /> unanimously. <br /> Group Member Weiler commented that he knew he was in the minority, but he wanted to <br /> note that at-large seats can capture and reflect population growth and that seats should <br /> represent people, not land. <br /> Group Member Dancy stated that she agreed with Group Member Weiler and that she <br /> was supportive of a couple of at-large seats. <br /> Group Member Sykes noted that with single member districts, sometimes you do not find <br /> countywide solutions. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian stated she was most comfortable with single member districts <br /> and Group Member Bremer noted that single member districts were the easiest to <br /> understand. <br /> Group Member Catterall noted that while he was supportive of single member districts, at <br /> large seats did allow a person to vote for more than one person to represent them. <br /> Group Member Arab commented that she can understand the interest in at-large <br /> members, but seven districts will allow equal representation of their perspectives. <br /> Group Co-Chair Mulkey inquired with Group members regarding a motion. Group <br /> Member Jenkins made a motion that the Group recommend seven single member <br /> residency districts where candidates in the districts are voted on in both the primary and <br /> the general election by only the voters in the respective districts. Group Member Catterall <br /> seconded the motion. Group Co-Chair Mulkey asked Mr. Wilder to call the names of <br /> Group members for voting purposes. Group members voted by roll call on the motion, <br /> and the motion was approved by a vote of 12 to 1, with Group Member Dancy opposed. <br /> Group Member Dancy indicated that she agreed with the recommendation for seven <br /> seats, but that there is value in having some at-large seats. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian noted that seven single member districts would require <br /> redistricting, and motioned that the Group strongly recommend that the Board of <br /> Commissioners establish a multi-partisan/non-partisan independent advisory group and <br /> process to create the seven districts: <br /> • based the criteria outlined in the Group's Charge — Constitutional and statutory <br /> requirements and voting rights law; Proportionality, Equity, Uniformity, <br /> Simplicity/clarity, and Maximizing voter engagement <br /> • that seeks wherever possible to keep communities of interest together; and <br /> • that avoids splitting precincts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.