Browse
Search
BEAG Meeting Summary 072421
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
BOCC Elections Advisory Group
>
Minutes/Summaries
>
2021
>
BEAG Meeting Summary 072421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2021 12:23:44 PM
Creation date
8/2/2021 12:23:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/24/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOCC Elections Advisory Group 07222021
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\BOCC Elections Advisory Group\Agendas\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> lead to better representation. Seven single member districts matched the number of <br /> seven townships in the County. Responses in the SurveyMonkey also supported non- <br /> partisan elections. Candidates could also be required to be long-standing members of <br /> the community, not individuals new to the County who do not understand what rural voters <br /> need. If nothing changes, the citizens of Orange County will be greatly discouraged. <br /> Group Member Jaaz Catterall indicated agreement with many of Group Member Arab's <br /> comments and noted that true election districts would increase voter engagement. <br /> Group Member Nathan Boucher indicated an interest in the Group recommending <br /> providing greater representation for the northern part of the County. <br /> Group Member Jennifer Bremer commented that she leaned toward single member <br /> districts and not in favor of at-large candidates and noted that 60 counties in North <br /> Carolina have five commissioner seats and 33 have seven seats. <br /> Group Member Williams stated that he agreed with individual districts and that at-large <br /> seats might be worth considering if the population was more evenly distributed throughout <br /> the County. He expressed concern that the Group had not conducted much discussion <br /> so that he could be comfortable with making a recommendation and that it might be worth <br /> requesting more time for the Group to work. <br /> Group Member Susana Dancy noted the strong interest in district level voting from the <br /> SurveyMonkey and that pursuing districts along township lines was hard given the <br /> County's population distribution. <br /> Group Member Martha Jenkins noted that she appreciated Group Member Arab's <br /> comments and agreed with many of the other comments, that the Group was not drawing <br /> the districts, and that following township lines would not comply with the one person/one <br /> vote requirements. <br /> Group Member Krishna Mondal expressed an interest in seven single member districts <br /> which would provide good representation from various groups and from the <br /> unincorporated areas. <br /> Group Member Jonathan Weiler noted that he supported the re-balancing from the heavy <br /> Chapel Hill representation on the Board of Commissioners, and that he realized he was <br /> in the minority with the thought there should be a mix of at-large and district seats with <br /> better representation of the other areas of the County. <br /> Group Member Sykes indicated an interest in single member districts with seven or nine <br /> seats, with population growth being a consideration for more than seven seats, and that <br /> she felt like it was best to not pursue something that might involve the North Carolina <br /> General Assembly. <br /> Group Co-Chair Mulkey indicated interest in seven single member districts. He noted <br /> that making elections non-partisan usually wound up focusing to political parties anyway <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.