Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-2003-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 11-05-2003
>
Agenda - 11-05-2003-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 1:14:31 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:35:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20031105
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-141 Growth Management System - Amendments to Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances (2)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~acb~~~ <br />Planning Staff Report for August 29, 2002 <br />Board of County Commissioners Work Session <br />Growth Control Issues <br />ISSUE 1: Identify the details of a proposed moratoria including: size and scale of a large <br />residential project. <br />RESPONSE: August 7a', 2002, the Planning Boazd agreed to define large development <br />as any subdivision with 20 or more lots. <br />ISSUE 2: Determine what "pipeline" proposals would be affected. <br />RESPONSE: The Planning Board discussed three "pipeline" options at which to stop an <br />existing project: <br />1.) A subdivision that has been submitted to staff; <br />2,) The project's concept plan has been approved by the Planning Boatel; <br />3,) A project that has been issued a formal preliminary approval by the BOCC. <br />ISSUE 3: List the steps necessary to produce/implement alimited growth moratorium or <br />other growth control. <br />RESPONSE: 1. Report to the Orange County Boazd of County Commissioners of June <br />18, 2002, in response to the Orange County Planning Boazd "Growth Control Letter of <br />May 6, 2002. A morntorium could be enacted in the following time frame. The length of <br />the moratorium would be coordinated with the completion of a unified development <br />ordinance which would create a special use process for major subdivisions. The Planning <br />Boazd has asked for additional time to process subdivision applications. The <br />comprehensive plan land use element, adequate public facilities ordinance, and ordinance <br />revisions regarding water resource issues would be concurrently researched and <br />implemented to some degree. <br />The shortest regulaz timeframe for the enactment of a moratorium would be as follows: <br />Request for Legal Ad November 6, 2002 <br />Quarterly Public Bearing November 25, 2002 <br />Planning Boazd Action December 4, 2002 <br />BOCC Action December 10, 2002 <br />A shorter timeframe if requested could be accomplished by creating a special public <br />hearing at a regular BOCC date. <br />RESPONSE: 2, Llnified Development Ordinance Definition <br />A Unified Development Ordinance (tJDO) is a combined land development code that <br />integrates the present planning regulatory system of "tree standing" codes of subdivision, zoning, <br />environmental impacts, erosion control, flood management and economic development. <br />The Unified Development Ordinance creates a comprehensive and cross referenced <br />document, combines various land use controls in a different procedural context. For example, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.