Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 5.5.21 <br /> 224 Permitted Uses. It's not like these uses were not allowed anywhere, all of these use types occur in the Table of Permitted <br /> 225 Uses as allowed somewhere. <br /> 226 <br /> 227 Lamar Proctor: For some specific zoning, all of it is allowed? <br /> 228 <br /> 229 Perdita Holtz: Correct. These were not prohibited Countywide uses. <br /> 230 <br /> 231 Lamar Proctor: I saw on Special Use Permits,the Planning Director is allowed to modify those by,there's a list,for minor <br /> 232 changes and I think that's under 2.7.14; how many times can an applicant come back for a minor modification like that? <br /> 233 <br /> 234 Perdita Holtz: There isn't a limit to how many times they can come back but I will say, it's exceedingly rare. <br /> 235 <br /> 236 Craig Benedict: In my 22 years, less than five times. It is exceedingly rare because our SUP conditions that are approved <br /> 237 are very finite and specific to the project. <br /> 238 <br /> 239 Lamar Proctor: Asking directly about the 10 days, could we just make it 15 days? Is that crazy? <br /> 240 <br /> 241 Perdita Holtz: The Planning Board could vote to recommend that it be 15 days and it could go to the Board of County <br /> 242 Commissioners as the Planning Board's recommendation. <br /> 243 <br /> 244 Lamar Proctor: The exclusions used to apply to Conditional Districts and the new LIDO would remove that exclusion list, <br /> 245 correct? <br /> 246 <br /> 247 Perdita Holtz: It used to apply to Conditional Use Districts which no longer are allowed to be a zoning mechanism in North <br /> 248 Carolina. The whole construct of Conditional Use Districts is gone. <br /> 249 <br /> 250 Lamar Proctor: Under 1.6.2 that whole section was stricken and I think the footnote says it's in policy documents, does <br /> 251 taking that out of the UDO change it in substantive way? <br /> 252 <br /> 253 Perdita Holtz: No, unless you consider that changing it would currently require a UDO text amendment whereas changing <br /> 254 it in the future would only require an amendment to the Planning Board Rules of Procedures. <br /> 255 <br /> 256 Craig Benedict: When the UDO was developed there was no separate policy mechanism for the advisory boards and over <br /> 257 the last 10 years the Commissioners and Attorneys' Office have put together policies for each of the advisory boards. <br /> 258 <br /> 259 Lamar Proctor: Who can make the Planning Board amendments? If it's just a policy? <br /> 260 <br /> 261 Perdita Holtz: It could start with staff,the Planning Board, or BOCC but the BOCC has to approve it. <br /> 262 <br /> 263 Lamar Proctor: I would love to see that 10 days become 15 days, that's a motion by me. Instead of a uniform 10 days <br /> 264 make it a uniform 15 days. <br /> 265 <br /> 266 MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to require 15 days instead of 10 days for mailings. Seconded by Alexandra Allman. <br /> 267 <br /> 268 Lamar Proctor Yes <br /> 269 Charity Kirk No <br /> 270 Adam Beeman: No <br /> 271 Carrie Fletcher No <br /> 272 Whitney Watson No <br /> 273 Randy Marshall: No <br /> 274 Susan Hunter: No <br /> 275 Alexandra Allman Yes <br /> 276 Melissa Poole: No <br /> 277 David Blankfard: No <br /> 278 MOTION FAILED 8—2 <br /> 279 <br />