Browse
Search
110420 Virtual Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
110420 Virtual Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 8:12:37 PM
Creation date
6/15/2021 8:11:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/4/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Planning Board - 110420 Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2020
Planning Board - 110420 Attachment 1
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 1/6/21 <br /> 335 departments have these projects on file. DOTs know current traffic counts, do the two match? Or, are we, in Orange <br /> 336 County going to be like Robertsdale,Alabama or Benton or Madisonville,Texas all places that suffered hugely from the <br /> 337 costly underestimates of Buc-ee's traffic and as everybody admits Buc-ee's is a heavy traffic generator. They choose their <br /> 338 own estimates so I ask you, please get those numbers so you can make the right choice. <br /> 339 <br /> 340 Matt Cartmill: This is a big proposal and will have a big impact on Orange County. (bad connection—audio garbled)we <br /> 341 have no say in how this property gets developed. New zoning will give Buc-ee's and the Planning Department mutually <br /> 342 agreeable negotiating conditions which neither you nor the community will ever get to review again. Otherwise, Mr. Beard <br /> 343 the director of real estate said in a meeting on Thursday, quote: zoning gives the community a say in future development <br /> 344 that isn't true as Mr. Beard ought to know. He said,this rezoning is more restrictive than what's there at the moment. But <br /> 345 MPD-CZ zoning is carte blanc zoning. Promises about future development which would (bad connection—audio garbled) <br /> 346 Whatever Buc-ee's thinks is good for its bottom-line when the time comes. Mr. Beard admitted on Thursday that it was at <br /> 347 least 6 to 8 years and whatever then if anything will have to serve Buc-ee's needs. Local needs aren't their concern. <br /> 348 They're focused on the thousands of cars moving through their huge parking lot. The surrounding community is a nuisance <br /> 349 that Buc-ee's has to barricade the site with a fence on the north boundary. Their proposed roadway change isn't designed <br /> 350 for(bad connection—audio garbled)traffic in and out of their acres of grab and go merchandising with little real concern for <br /> 351 their effect on Mr. Beeman and other local folks. Buc-ee's spokesman tell all their plans have local needs in mind and that <br /> 352 Buc-ee's will anchor wonderful future development, hotels and elegant shops, restaurants that will somehow want to come <br /> 353 and locate next to a gas station. This is imaginary(bad connection—audio garbled)a real trap.Tell us that zoning places <br /> 354 severe restriction on future development. It'won't. They asked their 120 nozzles each with it's own pump somehow add <br /> 355 up to only 60 pumps. They hope that all this misdirect will pay off for them in the short run and they hope to keep that as <br /> 356 short as possible by pushing this proposal through on the fastest track they can. Efland and Orange County don't need the <br /> 357 world's largest gas station. We need sensible development on a local scale meets local needs and what we need first off is <br /> 358 more time for deliberation. I ask to table this proposal. Give more time that way all the results for good and for ill Buc-ee's <br /> 359 would bring this town and this county. <br /> 360 <br /> 361 Tim Spruill: My wife and I moved from Chapel Hill 21 years ago to Efland in order to get away from an urban environment. <br /> 362 Exit 160 was then and is now the perfect place of Efland. A small peaceful rural town that still has trees,cows and nature. <br /> 363 This was exactly what we wanted until now not much has changed. Buc-ee's will change all of that. Most of the current <br /> 364 land that Buc-ee's will be located on will be covered in concrete and buildings, about approximately 60 acres. The entire <br /> 365 pasture and old field eco system will be destroyed and with it all of the animals and plants that make Efland rural and <br /> 366 pleasant and a draw for probably most of the people who live there. The remaining opposed 40 acres of open space will be <br /> 367 a lawn, a monoculture with minimal eco system function,very unlike the native soil and trees and vegetation that currently <br /> 368 limit carbon releases to the atmosphere at a time when global warming is a primary concern for humanity decreasing <br /> 369 carbon sync is not in line with sustainability principles. Buc-ee's will be providing what is already available, lots of gas <br /> 370 stations to fuel more carbon emissions and lots of concrete. In addition, it will draw thousands of cars and the associated <br /> 371 pollution and present potential contamination of soil, air and water. I strongly oppose this proposed development as it is not <br /> 372 in line with the existing zoning designation which should not be changed and in addition it is hardly consistent with <br /> 373 maintaining the existing rural character of Efland. The County needs to be serious about supporting sustainable <br /> 374 community, maintaining the existing O/RM designation will be the evidence of that. <br /> 375 <br /> 376 Jared Cates: Hello, I live 1000 feet from the proposed site and I am not anti-development but I feel that Buc-ee's will <br /> 377 negatively impact our community's quality of life and has the potential to stifle future economic growth in the area due to <br /> 378 overwhelming traffic. When we moved to Efland,we researched the development plans for the area and heard rumors of a <br /> 379 Target being developed in a portion of this same proposed site. We knew that development was coming and still made a <br /> 380 decision to purchase our home because of existing area plans and the 0/RM zoning of the nearby site was seemingly <br /> 381 designated with significant community input. Also, I can buy more things at a Target than Chinese-made beaver trinkets. <br /> 382 However,we would not have moved to Efland had we known that one of the largest gas stations in the country, a 24/7 <br /> 383 monstrosity that provides no goods or services that our community actually needs,will be moving in within 1000 feet of our <br /> 384 home. What is the point of community planning if residents cannot actually plan their lives and investments appropriately <br /> 385 around what the community has planned for? Orange County has proven it can be innovative with economic development <br /> 386 and land use planning at critical urban/rural nodes and that it listens to its citizens when making long-term plans, however, <br /> 387 this proposal is the opposite of innovative. It does not fit with what this area has planned for in short-and long-term growth <br /> 388 particularly when it comes to traffic impacts on surrounding roads. Buc-ee's claims that one of the largest gas stations in <br /> 389 the world makes sense to be situated in Efland, a critical transportation node for western and northern Orange County. <br /> 390 Even with the proposed road infrastructure improvements that node cannot handle a 25,000 plus daily trips this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.