Orange County NC Website
Approved 1/6/21 <br /> 782 Michael Harvey: I want to remind the Board, one of the conditions the applicant has asked for on page 188 is that <br /> 783 consideration of LEED certified practices for components of the project where feasible will be incorporated. We've also got <br /> 784 standards governing placement of solar, encouraging the placement of solar. <br /> 785 <br /> 786 Adam Beeman: Typically,when big projects like this come in they tend to hire contractors from outside the state. Is there <br /> 787 any way we can get a commitment from you guys to hire local contractors? <br /> 788 <br /> 789 Stan Beard: Typically,we have 2 or 3 fairly major general contractors who build our buildings.They've built them for years <br /> 790 and they know how to do them. But what they do is they come to every single locale and figure out who their local subs are <br /> 791 going to be. I've given data before, I just don't have it at my fingertips, local construction dollars are a big part of our project. <br /> 792 A lot of local sizable subcontractor will have opportunity to be part of this project. <br /> 793 <br /> 794 Michael Harvey: I have some additional review of conditions and discussion on stormwater, signage, and traffic <br /> 795 management issues. <br /> 796 <br /> 797 Michael Reviewed the Draft Conditions Contained in Attachment 9 from Pg. 166 to Pg. 188 including potential stormwater <br /> 798 conditions to address concerns over impacts to the Seven Mile Creek Preserve area south of the Interstate, signage height, <br /> 799 and access management for the project. Michael also read into the minutes an email from Steve Ramarge on the closure of <br /> 800 westbound Exit 160 and possible modifications to the proposed traffic access management plan for the Project that could <br /> 801 preserve the exit as currently configured. <br /> 802 <br /> 803 David Blankfard: Can I get a motion to add the requirement discussed that the hotel have interior hallways. <br /> 804 <br /> 805 MOTION by Melissa Poole to adopt the condition that any hotel is interior accessed. Seconded by Randy Marshall. <br /> 806 <br /> 807 ROLLCALL VOTE: <br /> 808 Randy Marshall: Yes <br /> 809 Kim Piracci: Yes <br /> 810 Adam Beeman: Yes <br /> 811 Susan Hunter: Yes <br /> 812 Patricia Roberts: Yes <br /> 813 Alexandra Allman Yes <br /> 814 Melissa Poole: Yes <br /> 815 David Blankfard: Yes <br /> 816 Carrie Fletcher Yes <br /> 817 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY <br /> 818 <br /> 819 Adam Beeman: I would like the applicant to commit to a minimum of 30 spaces for a commuter park and ride so people <br /> 820 can park their cars there and hitch a ride with someone else to work and there is no worry about being stuck in a lot getting <br /> 821 towed away. <br /> 822 <br /> 823 Beth Trahos: There is an area identified on the master plan to be utilized by the County in some in form or fashion to <br /> 824 support transit. If that was the route the County chose to take it could certainly be accommodated given the designation <br /> 825 and commitments made as a part of the master plan. <br /> 826 <br /> 827 Adam Beeman: I don't know if their future plan is the bus stop or it's a train station. I know a lot of people travel through <br /> 828 there and it would be nice for people to drop their car and catch a ride. It would be nice to have that designation. <br /> 829 <br /> 830 Stan Beard: We have reserved development area 6 for a public transit facility to be determined by all of us. When we hear <br /> 831 park and ride we get a little jumpy and so we would definitely work with you on what that looks like as far as security, <br /> 832 lighting and rules, etc. In some conversations park and rides weren't that great but that maybe an actual bus stop/drop off <br /> 833 would be more in line with what Orange County wanted. If you guys want to figure out a way to manage that development <br /> 834 area 6 we're all for it. We would be respectfully careful about what that was but yes we will work with you. <br /> 835 Michael Harvey: Would it be sufficient if the Planning Board took the position in its recommendation that the County <br /> 836 Commissioners consider as part of development area 6, a park and ride amenity as part of the regional transportation <br /> 837 efforts would that address your concern? <br />