Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-15-2021; 8-g - JCPC Certification and County Plan for FY 2021-2022
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Agenda - 06-15-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 06-15-2021; 8-g - JCPC Certification and County Plan for FY 2021-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2021 4:33:50 PM
Creation date
6/10/2021 4:44:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/15/2021
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-g
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-15-2021 Virtual Business meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29 <br /> This is the first program PEP report that has a SPEP score and Denise helped explain how to interpret the <br /> scares. For the PTS Group component, the total SPEP score is 65 out of 100 (a score below 50 requires <br /> Department attention). This score could be higher if they were able to reach more youth and terminate <br /> more youth (Covid pandemic has really affected SPEP scores and the Department understand this). SPEP <br /> score compares all programs across the State regardless of program type. The POP score looks at this <br /> particular type against other programs of the same type. This program scored a POP of 76 out of 85. PTS <br /> Home Visitation component has a SPEP of 40 out of 100 and a PDP of 47 out of 85. Even though the <br /> scores are low and would normally require Department attention, due to the impact of Covid on <br /> programming across the state,the Department is not concerned. However, they will take note of the score <br /> and if it continues to remain low in the fallowing years then they will take a closer look. <br /> Volunteersfor Youth—Teen Court is not a SPEP program. They are at 20 out of 20 and their goal is to <br /> maintain that score. Since Covid,they have started weekly staff meetings, developed/updated policy <br /> manuals, and been able to focus on staff training. <br /> Community Service program is a SPEP program with a score of 59 out of 100 and a POP of 74 out of 80. <br /> They will also continue to pursue staff training opportunities, have weekly staff meeting, and continue to <br /> monitor policies and make adjustments when needed. Denise will follow-up with Susan on revising the <br /> PEP for Community Service program because some of the areas are lacking information on how they can <br /> be improved. <br /> Numbers are low for both programs,especially Teen Court. They are going to start hosting mock trials <br /> and have community service kids participate so that they can get hours and it will also allow volunteers to <br /> keep working with Teen Court. The Community Service program continues virtual activities and the last <br /> couple months they have incorporated some in-person activities. The activities have been outdoor yard. <br /> work for elderly residents and everyone practiced safe social distancing and wore masks. <br /> Wrenn House—Wrenn House is not a SPEP program because youth are often only there for emergency or <br /> respite care. Their score is 20 out of 20. They will continue to enhance safety measures related to Covid <br /> and will enhance program outreach efforts in the community to reach more youth in need of services. <br /> Their action steps are to remain up-to-date with CDC and state guidelines, update efforts for outreach by <br /> connecting with new community stakeholders to share program services and creating new ways to provide <br /> outreach through virtual platforms. <br /> JJ Data Report <br /> This data is from the new system and was pulled for the months of September and October. They do not <br /> have the data for November until later this month. <br /> September—8 juveniles at intake, 13 complaints received, 1 undisciplined petition, 0 school-based <br /> complaints, 7 approved for court, 1 juvenile diverted, 0 closed, 4 placed in detention for a total of 45 days, <br /> 1 at Wrenn House(partial day), and 6 youth on electronic monitoring for a total of 93 days. <br /> October- 13 juveniles at intake, 23 complaints received, 1 undisciplined petition,3 school-based <br /> complaints, 10 approved for court, 2 juveniles diverted, 1 closed, 5 placed in detention for a total of 90 <br /> days, 1 at Wrenn House for 25 days, and 4 youth on electronic monitoring for a total of 100 days. <br /> Raise the Age YTD: 29 juveniles(projected 54) at intake with 71 complaints (projected 129) <br /> One of the school-based complaints reported in October was from an incident that happened before school <br /> shutdown due to Covid and the old charge was dismissed and a new charge was redrawn. Another <br /> complaint was from an incident that happened in December 2019. In this case the youth was referred to <br /> Teen Court and after multiple attempts and non-compliance on the juvenile'slparent's part, a petition was <br /> then submitted to Juvenile Court. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.