Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2021; 5 - Options to Expand Affordable Housing Incentives and Opportunities
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2021
>
Agenda - 06-03-2021 Virtual Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
>
Agenda - 06-03-2021; 5 - Options to Expand Affordable Housing Incentives and Opportunities
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2021 3:05:05 PM
Creation date
5/27/2021 2:49:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2021
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5
Document Relationships
Agenda for June 3, 2021 Virtual Budget Public Hearing & Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2021\Agenda - 06-03-2021 Virtual Budget Public Hearing and Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> SURVEY SUMMARY ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING REGULATORY BARRIERS <br /> AUGUST 2020 <br /> Background <br /> In July, the Orange County Department of Housing and Community Development <br /> surveyed local real estate developers to identify barriers and possible incentives to <br /> affordable housing development. Survey questions asked about development <br /> standards, fees, developable land in Orange County and the affordable housing density <br /> bonus. Four developers responded — two nonprofit and two for-profit — and identified <br /> several regulatory, financing and other market-driven obstacles to affordable housing <br /> development in addition to policy solutions and possible incentives that may mitigate <br /> these obstacles. <br /> Regulatory Barriers <br /> Survey respondents identified several regulatory barriers in Orange County that inhibit <br /> or complicate affordable housing development. One developer described inconsistency <br /> in fees and review processes across jurisdictions as a challenge. Several others cited <br /> high impact fees, slow building permitting processes, and long development review <br /> timelines as inhibiting factors. One developer also mentioned low-density zoning, <br /> watershed restrictions, and the Rural Buffer as land-use limitations on buildable land. <br /> Another developer had never considered developing outside of the jurisdictions <br /> because they assumed that the broader County is not zoned to allow multifamily <br /> building. Possible incentives suggested include reducing or refunding development <br /> fees, relaxing building permitting processes, creating an expedited review process for <br /> affordable housing projects, and otherwise modifying land-use regulations or creating <br /> exceptions for affordable housing developments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.