Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-01-2021; 7-a - Buckhorn Area Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Agenda - 06-01-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 06-01-2021; 7-a - Buckhorn Area Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2021 11:51:09 AM
Creation date
5/27/2021 12:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/1/2021
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7-a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 <br /> Preservation areas including Voluntary Agricultural Districts (VADs), Conservation Easements, and National Heritage <br /> Element Occurrences (NHEOs), all of which were given negative values during the technical GIS analysis. VADs are <br /> voluntary and can be opted out of whereas conservation easements are permanent legal agreements that limit the uses <br /> of land in order to protect its conservation values. The only parcel with a conservation easement in the Buckhorn Area <br /> Study was the Soccer.com Center, east of Gravelly Hill Middle School,which was not included in the analysis. All NHEO <br /> parcels, areas where land or water is important for the conservation of natural biodiversity, fall outside of the Focus <br /> Areas A and B. <br /> 3.b. Were there watershed considerations as a function of the technical study? <br /> Yes. Areas that fall within the State's critical water supply watersheds were clipped to be not included in the study <br /> meaning that there was never intent to even explore these critical areas. While Orange County's locally-designated <br /> critical areas are not regulated by the NC Department of Environmental Quality—and,therefore, are not included in the <br /> study as a whole—both Focus Area A and B lie west of the County's critical area. As such, both Focus Areas lie outside of <br /> the critical watershed area for the State as well as the critical watershed area for Orange County. <br /> 3.c. Is Orange County compliant with the State's requirements for the Protected and Critical Areas of <br /> the Upper Eno Watershed? <br /> Yes. The State's Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, Department of Environmental Quality, recently <br /> confirmed that Orange County is meeting its requirements and in some cases is more stringent. For additional detail, <br /> including a comprehensive description of the County's watershed program, a white paper has been made available at <br /> the following link: https://www.orangecountync.gov/DocumentCenter/View/15859/County-Watershed-Plan---Final- <br /> Draft-Memo?bidld=. <br /> 3.d. Were there social considerations as a function of the technical study? <br /> Yes. Small-lot residential areas in the study were identified and mapped. In an effort to preserve rural residential <br /> appeal, buffering these residential areas from light and noise was intended to be defined and applied to protect <br /> residents' quality of life and is stipulated as recommendations at the end of the study. Additionally, parcels that were <br /> already developed with social significance—schools, churches, cemeteries—were also removed from analytical <br /> consideration. <br /> 3.e. Is Gravelly Hill Middle School labelled on the maps included in the Study? <br /> Yes. The location of Gravelly Hill Middle School is shown on several of the maps in the Study, including on the cover <br /> page. Gravelly Hill Middle School is also mentioned in the text of the Study on p. 66. <br /> 3.f. Were there economic development considerations as a function of the technical study? <br /> Yes. The study area from the Buckhorn Area Study includes the entire Buckhorn Economic Development District (BEDD), <br /> a dedicated development district created in 2011 by Orange County and the City of Mebane. Metrics to consider the <br /> most 'highly developable' parcels took into consideration factors such as average (mean) slope,total number of <br /> developable acres, access to water and sewer infrastructure, interstate access and visibility, roadway access and <br /> proximity to existing rail; all of these attributes and the resulting highest-scoring parcels from the analysis were used to <br /> inform where economic development could take place in the area. <br /> 3.g. Were there traffic considerations as a function of the technical study? <br /> Yes. While interstate access and interstate visibility were metrics that were measured as a function of the analysis, <br /> recommendations were made in order to keep traffic along West Ten Road manageable, particularly because Gravelly <br /> Hill Middle School lies near the center of West Ten Road. <br /> The City of Mebane will continue to require a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)for applications for preliminary plat or <br /> rezoning requests that anticipate generating 100 or more peak-hour vehicle trips or 1,000 or more average daily trips <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.