Orange County NC Website
49 <br /> 2.c. Where are the existing water and sewer utilities in this area located? <br /> The existing water and sewer utilities are located both north and south of the Focus Areas A and B. In the map below, <br /> the existing water lines are delineated by the checkered blue line;the dark green line indicates existing gravity sewer <br /> lines while the lighter green lines indicate force sewer lines. <br /> Outreach Focus Areas A and B-Utilities <br /> } . <br /> F— <br /> L <br /> _ . <br /> p M r <br /> 1ti� tip_-+► _- � 1� I <br /> a <br /> Q <br /> I <br /> sawmaro ao .. .. <br /> it <br /> F-1 Outreach Focus Areas A <br /> 0 Outreach Focus Areas B <br /> Existing Sewer Force Main v ' <br /> �y ao <br /> —Existing Sewer Gravity <br /> Existing Wafer Lines \ <br /> 2.d. How do water and sewer utilities affect growth? <br /> In most cases, development will only occur where there are sufficient utilities in order for businesses to operate. It can <br /> be inferred that businesses are most likely to develop in areas where the utilities are present or planned while areas <br /> lacking utilities are not of interest to development, even if there are other attractive attributes to businesses. <br /> 2.e. Will Areas C, D and E remain viable for development? <br /> Approximately, one-third of Area C and a relatively small part of Are E,west of the 1-85/US70-Connector, are located in <br /> areas that are consistent with the existing Orange County Future Land Use Map and remain viable for non-residential <br /> development. Area D is not consistent with the existing Orange County Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and is not viable <br /> for non-residential development. Presently the BOCC has not requested any changes to the FLUM. Areas C, D, and E all <br /> have area in the Orange County Critical Watershed, which presents additional limitations for development. There is <br /> nothing that prohibits the development of properties located within Areas C, D, and E that is consistent with the existing <br /> FLUM and Zoning, which currently support areas for low-density residential development. The City of Mebane's <br /> Comprehensive Land Development Plan also provides insight into potential development in the Study area. <br /> 3. Balance of Goals — Environmental, Economic and Equity in Services <br /> 3.a. Were there environmental considerations as a function of the technical study? <br /> Yes. Mebane and its surrounding area have relatively few slope constraints, which would make potential land <br /> development more difficult or expensive. No development has been encouraged on environmental wetlands, and areas <br /> that limit development—particularly wetlands and flood zones—were removed from analysis. <br />