Orange County NC Website
44 <br /> 1 still considered close in the such areas. She said the road signs need to be changed, as there <br /> 2 is no way one can read them in a safe way. <br /> 3 Craig Benedict, Planning Director, said there is a large-scale amendment coming up. <br /> 4 He said the City of Durham is moving its water supply intake 1500 feet upstream, which impacts <br /> 5 Orange County zoning. He said the County will notify 1500-2000 people who are affected by <br /> 6 the zoning change, as well as those properties within 1000 feet of the actual area where the <br /> 7 change will occur. He said there will be public meetings as well. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 A motion was made by Commissioner Hamilton, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> 10 open the public hearing. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Roll call ensued <br /> 13 <br /> 14 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 15 <br /> 16 PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br /> 17 Janine Zanin said the UDO reduces the notice from 15 days to 10 days, justified by state <br /> 18 law. She said State law sets a basement level, and Orange County traditionally operates above <br /> 19 the level. She said 10 days does not allow for enough time for a resident to read about, and <br /> 20 plan for attending the meeting. She said the County should move in the opposite direction. She <br /> 21 said the UDO gives a lot of discretion, and she would like to be consistent and predictable. She <br /> 22 said the discretion was not well used for the Buckhorn Area Plan. She said Commissioner <br /> 23 Greene and Chair Price commented recently on the need for more notice, and it is not clear why <br /> 24 Planning staff would want to provide less notice. She said 1000 feet does not go very far in <br /> 25 rural areas. She said neighbors at the top of her road recently received a notice, but she did <br /> 26 not. She said she will be impacted by the same projects as her neighbors, but did not receive <br /> 27 notice. She said Orange County's mission statement says Orange County residents come first, <br /> 28 and this issue is an easy way to stand behind the mission statement. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Hamilton to <br /> 31 close the public hearing. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Roll call ensued <br /> 34 <br /> 35 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 36 <br /> 37 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Greene, to <br /> 38 authorize the acceptance of written comments by 9 a.m. on May 6, 2021 and to schedule a vote <br /> 39 on May 18 to approve a statement of consistency, UDO, and Comprehensive Plan <br /> 40 amendments, and amendments to the Rules of Procedure for the Planning Board. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Commissioner Dorosin asked if there is a process for making changes. <br /> 43 Perdita Holtz requested that any changes be communicated to staff now, in order for <br /> 44 staff to have the amendment packet ready on May 18th. <br /> 45 Commissioner Dorosin requested that the 10 days of notification be changed to 15 days. <br /> 46 Commissioner Greene requested more time to consider changes. <br /> 47 Commissioner Hamilton agreed with Commissioner Greene and asked for more time to <br /> 48 consider changes. <br /> 49 Commissioner McKee agreed, and said a lot of time was spent on proclamations and <br /> 50 special presentations, and it is too late to spend time to parse through the item. <br />