Browse
Search
2021-160-E IT-NetPlanner Systems Outside Plant Fiber
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2020's
>
2021
>
2021-160-E IT-NetPlanner Systems Outside Plant Fiber
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2021 10:42:53 AM
Creation date
5/10/2021 10:33:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contract
Date
3/9/2021
Contract Starting Date
3/9/2021
Contract Ending Date
3/12/2021
Contract Document Type
Contract
Amount
$307,070.14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DocuSign Envelope ID:78B556CA-0O28-4315-8EF4-948059C1C6F0 <br /> 5) On page 6, section e, the last sentence discusses multiple vendors proposed on one <br /> team. If there is more than one vendor on a team, do all vendors complete ALL forms <br /> (Attachment B, C, and e-Verify), as well as the information requested in the Vendor <br /> information, section C of the proposal contents, or do you need the information from the <br /> prime vendor? <br /> Only the prime vendor identified on page 2 is required to complete and sign Attachment <br /> B: Certification of Financial Condition, Attachment C: Addendum Acknowledgement, and <br /> turn in a completed and notarized E-verify form. <br /> Regarding section C — Vendor information, if there are other firms proposed as part of <br /> your team, provide their information as well. <br /> 6) Section 2.6 Revised —for section (d), if the proposer is more than one vendor, does the <br /> response to this section need to cover any litigation for ALL vendors on the team, or just <br /> the prime vendor? <br /> The response to Proposal Contents Section (d) shall cover any litigation for all vendors <br /> identified on the team. <br /> 7) Section 2.6 Revised — can you clarify what is meant by sections (f) and (g) —they both <br /> request a response to the same two options, the base project and the alternate, but <br /> specifically (f) does not really indicate what the response is for, while (g) is clear it <br /> concerns methodology and timeline. <br /> f) A written narrative response to address: <br /> • PrejeGt OrgaRizatiOR GFigiRal three (3) addresses and Campus Wide FffibeF PrejeGt <br /> • Pie^+�aRizatiOR AlteFRafe A PFejeGt —sptiGRaf <br /> Section (f) has been replaced for <br /> f) A written narrative response to address Project Organization in general <br /> g) A written narrative response to address Project Timeline and Methodology <br /> * PrejeGt QFganizatiGR Original three (3) addresses and Campus Wide Fiber PrejeGt <br /> Section (g) has been replaced for <br /> g) A written narrative response to address Project Timeline and Methodology in general <br /> 8) Section 2.6— Revised —for section (I) insurance, it indicates that no work shall <br /> commence until the insurance forms has been received by Risk Manager. This section <br /> implies that the insurance forms are a part of the submittal documents, so when are <br /> insurance forms required to be submitted, for the RFP submittal, or after <br /> selection/award? <br /> Certificate of insurance is required to be submitted with the bid response. However, if <br /> County's Risk Manager determines additional insurance coverage is required, such <br /> additional insurance shall be obtained prior commencing work. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.