Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
<br /> <br />Planning Staff Depart for August 2~, 202 <br />Board of County Commissioners W©rk Season <br />Growth Control Issues <br />ISSUE l: Identify the details of a proposed moratoria including: size and scale of a large <br />residential project. <br />RESPONSE: August 7`~, 2002, the Planning Board agreed to define Large development <br />as any subdivision with 20 or more lots. <br />ISSUE 2: Determine what `pipeline"proposals would be affected. <br />RESPONSE: The Planning Board discussed three "pipeline" options at which to stop an <br />existing project: <br />1.} A subdivision that has been submitted to staff; <br />2.} The project's concept plan has been approved by the Planning Board; <br />3.} A project that has been issued a formal preliminary approval by the BoCC. <br />ISSUE 3: List the steps necessary to produceJimplement alimited growth moratorium or <br />other growth control. <br />RESPONSE; 1. Report to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners of June <br />18, 2002, in res~nse to the Orange County Planning Boazd "Growth Control Letter of <br />May 6, 2002. A moratorium could be enacted in the following time frame. The length of <br />the moratorium would be coordinated with the completion of a unified development <br />ordinance which would create a special use process for major subdivisions. The Plazming <br />Board has asked for additional time to process subdivision applications. The <br />comprehensive plan land use element, adequate public facilities ordinance, and ordinance <br />revisions regarding water resource issues would be concurrently researched and <br />implemented to some degree. <br />The shortest regular timeframe for the enactment of a moratorium would be as follows: <br />Request for Legal Ad November 6, 2002 <br />Quarterly Public Hearing November 25, 2002 <br />Planning Board Action December 4, 2002 <br />BOCC Action December I0, 2002 <br />A shorter timeframe if requested could be accomplished by creating a special public <br />hearing at a regular BOCC date. <br />RESPONSE: 2. Unified Development ordinance Definition <br />A Unified Development Ordinance (UDO} is a combined land development code that <br />integrates the present planning regulatory system of "free standing" codes of subdivision, zoning, <br />environmental impacts, erosion control, flood management and economic development. <br />The Unified Development fhdinance creates a comprehensive and cross-referenced <br />document, combines various land use controls in a different procedural context. Far example, <br />