Agenda - 10-21-2003-9c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ATTACHMENT 8 37 DRAFT 139 Craig Benedict answered yes, there was a joint Board and Commissioner's meeting and over 100 140 people from every board had been invited and asked to be an ambassador. Some said yes, but 141 sometimes they bring recommendations and the recommendations would disappear. 142 143 AGENDA ITEM #H: ITEMS HEARD AT THE AUGUST 25, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING 144 Craig Benedict made the PowerPoint presentation 145 a.l. Incorporation by reference, of Water and Sewer Management Planning and 146 Boundary Agreement into Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and 147 Craig Benedict added that there would be an infrastructure element that will be prepared. The 148 infrastructure element includes water, sewer, drainage, paving, etc. Additional policies will be 149 incorporated in that element to help make other decisions. 150 151 MOTION was made by Hunter Schofield to incorporate by reference, Water and Sewer 152 Management Planning and Boundary Agreement into Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element by 153 Barry Katz and seconded. 154 VOTE: Unanimous 155 156 Hunter Schofield suggested that 8b.1. and 8b.2 be discussed first and then come back to 8a.2. 157 158 Craig Benedict stated that 8c. was incorporating the same map into the Zoning and Subdivision 159 Ordinance by reference. We could vote on 8c. first. 160 161 a.2. Growth Management System Proposed Amendments to Zoning and Subdivision 162 Regulations 163 Craig Benedict summarized the process and stated that there are four options to be considered. 164 Based on comments from the public hearing, there will a hybrid of options proposed. 165 Option 1 is the most restrictive and option 2, is an expansion of Option 1. He used the 166 example of Carrboro's Transition Areas: first building out an area and then let 167 development go to a second area at a later date. There was discussion of the maps that 168 were presented. He discussed 4 options for the attached map regarding urbanizing area 169 delineations. 170 171 Chair Nicole Gooding-Ray noted that the original discussion showed a boundary where it was 172 thought water could be served. 173 174 Craig Benedict agreed. 175 176 Chair Nicole Gooding-Ray noted that originally option 1 and option 3 were the focus points. 177 178 Craig Benedict answered that after deliberating with the attorney, using the existing zoning land 179 use constructs and water/sewer boundary constructs was better to use than potential areas that are 180 informal at this point. 181 182 Barry Katz verified that if there was a vote for option 1, and then over time, it would come back 183 to another Board and another group could expand that to include more areas once Option 1 has 37