Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
22 <br /> BOCC Action: <br /> Manager recommends the Board: <br /> 1. Receive request and conduct the public hearing, <br /> 2. Provide direction on any additional conditions consistent <br /> with Section 2,9.2(F)(3)of the UFO; <br /> 3. Close the public hearing and authorize acceptance of <br /> written comment(sj until 9:00 a.m.on Thursday February <br /> 4,2021; <br /> 4. Consider action to approve the Statement of Consistency <br /> (Attachment 8)and Zoning Atlas Amendment(Attachment <br /> 9)as recommended by Staff <br /> NOTE:If wrigan cemmonrs ro reraning rwl eivatl Fe re 11—the 1.11 Fab 4, 1— <br /> deedllne,WF IMm will he brnugbl bank la fiOCC na February 9fi,2a2 tar <br /> nn.laerad.n.a nn wan.n no rawna.me aeaemn a rbe It—en.0 <br /> bacornp affective ar B:pt a.m.an ThursdaYr February 4,30]1(approval of tlaniall. <br /> For more Iniormatlon or ouestions on this or000sal. <br /> all Halvey,Current Planning Superylgor O N�GE C�OUrv`Y <br /> mharveY®omn[IBtauntync am or 0,9)2a5.2597 , <br /> Craig Benedict clarified Michael Harvey's comment, noting that the Board could approve <br /> or deny the statement of consistency and zoning atlas amendment. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Fowler to <br /> open the public hearing. <br /> Roll call ensued <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br /> Chad Abbott asked if a condition could be applied to the application, such that the owner <br /> could have a separate maintenance building on the property at a location that still complies with <br /> setbacks and impervious surface requirements. He said it does not change the use or the <br /> conditional zoning use of the property. He said the owner has requested a 20 by 30 shed, for <br /> lawn care and maintenance equipment, outside of the fenced area of the property. He asked if <br /> staff could review this to make sure it meets the requirements of the zoning district. <br /> John Roberts said the Board would need to determine if staff could review this condition, <br /> and, if so, staff would need time to review this condition, and it would require the item be <br /> continued to a future meeting. <br /> Michael Harvey clarified the request by Chad Abbott, and said the building would not be <br /> for a business purpose, but rather just for storage. He said he did not see this condition as a <br /> problem, as there would not be any land disturbance, and it would not result in an increase in <br /> impervious surface. <br /> Chad Abbott said the shed would be outside of the storage facility, and outside of the <br /> fenced area. He said it would not be on impervious, but the impervious calculations for the <br /> watershed for the property would still be maintained. He said the stormwater group would <br /> review the construction drawings to make sure they meet the maximum impervious amounts. <br /> He said the condition of the storage facility would be in keeping with the zoning requirements of <br /> the property. <br /> Commissioner Greene asked if the condition is consistent with the zoning, why should it <br /> be continued to a future meeting. <br /> John Roberts said staff might need time to review it, but it seems that staff does not <br /> need that additional time. <br /> Craig Benedict said if the shed does not exceed the limits of 12%, then it can be <br /> approved. <br /> Commissioner Hamilton said she would like to have the item come back before the <br /> Commissioners at a future meeting, giving staff time to review and confirm that the condition is <br /> consistent with zoning. <br />