Orange County NC Website
34 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 VOTE: Ayes, 6 (Commissioner Bedford, Commissioner Fowler, Commissioner Greene, <br /> 3 Commissioner Hamilton, Commissioner McKee, Chair Price); Nays, 1 (Commissioner <br /> 4 Dorosin) <br /> 5 <br /> 6 MOTION PASSES <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Commissioner McKee expressed concerned about creating an ex officio member from a <br /> 9 broadband provider, as suggested by Katie Loovis. He said he does not believe that any one <br /> 10 provider should hold a seat because they could potentially have a compromised position if they <br /> 11 have an interest in submitting a proposal. <br /> 12 Commissioner Greene agreed with Commissioner McKee and said she spoke with Lee <br /> 13 Worsley at Triangle J Council of Governments, and Triangle J will provide resources for the task <br /> 14 force should it be necessary. <br /> 15 Commissioner McKee supported the suggestion of Triangle J Council of Governments <br /> 16 providing support. <br /> 17 Commissioner Fowler clarified that the meetings will be open, should a broadband <br /> 18 provider want to attend. <br /> 19 Commissioner McKee said all providers should be invited to provide information. <br /> 20 Chair Price noted the time, and asked if the board wanted to continue with the meeting. <br /> 21 The board agreed by consensus to proceed. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 d. Appointments to the BOCC Elections Advisory Group <br /> 24 The Board considered: <br /> 25 <br /> 26 1) making fifteen appointments to the BOCC Elections Advisory Group; <br /> 27 2) directing the Group to select Co-Chairs, with one individual from the District 1 area of the <br /> 28 County and one individual from the District 2 area of the County; and <br /> 29 3) providing any further direction on the charge to the Group as it relates to desired <br /> 30 outcomes from the Group's work <br /> 31 <br /> 32 BACKGROUND: <br /> 33 At the Board of Commissioners' April 7, 2020 Virtual Business meeting, a petition was <br /> 34 presented that the Board discuss and potentially change a portion of the process under which <br /> 35 some or all Board members are elected. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 The Board subsequently discussed the issue at its May 5, 2020 Virtual Business meeting and <br /> 38 voted to: <br /> 39 1) Establish a committee to study alternative methods of election; <br /> 40 2) Select members for the committee no later than January 31, 2021; <br /> 41 3) Have the committee review options and report back by July 31, 2021; and <br /> 42 4) For the Board to review the recommendations, and if necessary conduct public hearings <br /> 43 and make a decision in time for the March 2022 primary election. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 The Board subsequently discussed the proposal further at its September 10, 2020 work <br /> 46 session. Staff requested direction from the Board on: <br /> 47 • the total number of members the committee should include; <br /> 48 • whether the committee should consist entirely of residents; <br /> 49 • whether election or other experts would be considered/appointed; <br /> 50 0 whether there should be representation from nonprofit entities; <br />