Browse
Search
Planning Board - 030321 ORC Agenda Packet - Replacement Att 1 - 160D
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Agendas
>
2021
>
Planning Board - 030321 ORC Agenda Packet - Replacement Att 1 - 160D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2021 3:22:38 PM
Creation date
2/26/2021 2:32:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Planning Board - 030321 ORC Agenda Packet
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Ordinance Review Committee\Agendas\2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Standards 259 <br /> Section 6.7: Additional Standards for MPD-CZDCD <br /> (C) Development Standards <br /> (1) Dimensional Requirements <br /> (a) There are no minimum lot sizes within the MPD-GZ-CD district; However, <br /> the Master Plan will set forth the individual lot setbacks in accordance <br /> with the General Dimensional Requirements established herein. <br /> STANDARDS .- HILLSBOROUGH <br /> COVERMINIMUM ZONING MINIMUM SETBACKS <br /> LOT <br /> MAXIMUM MAXIMUM <br /> ZONING SIDE IMPERVIOUS HEIGHT <br /> DISTRICT AREA WIDTH FRONT REAR ONE SURFACE (FEET) <br /> (ACRE) (FEET) (FEET) (FEET) SIDE COMBINED STREET <br /> MPD- 200 60 40 20 40 40 50 60 <br /> CZCD <br /> (b) Single-family and duplex residential uses following the flexible <br /> development guidelines established in Section 7.13 of this Ordinance, <br /> may reduce the minimum setbacks by 50% and the lot width by 60%. <br /> (2) Internal Access <br /> (a) All outparcels within the MPD-GZ-CD district shall have internal access <br /> to the development. <br /> (b) All parcels shall provide for interconnectivity between parking areas if <br /> determined necessary by staff. <br /> (3) No drive through facilities may be constructed in this district. <br /> (4) Consideration of lower cost and affordable housing shall be incorporated into any <br /> mixed use development. <br /> (5) A justification for any deviation to development standards must state a public <br /> benefit or purpose. <br /> (D) Plan Approvals <br /> (1) If a MPD-GZ-CD rezoning application is approved with a Master Plan, the <br /> approval does not obviate the need to obtain a Glass n SpeGial Use Permit er <br /> site plan approval for the individual "pods"/lots shown on the Master Plan in <br /> accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. <br /> (2) o Glass o eneGial Use Permit shall be r re,t iflf any nonresidential use is <br /> located within two hundred feet of a property line of an existing dwelling unit <br /> located on a lot smaller than 2 acres in size, an appropriate Conditional District <br /> must be approved. See Section 5.3.2( ;-)5.21.2 for standards for uses requiring a <br /> Class o Special Use PermitConditional District approval. <br /> (3) No special use permit for� governed by an approved MPD CZ_M aster Plan <br /> ��� ���«.,a �,,,r,o,-�sFte�o <br /> v he denied for reasons t forth in Section_2.5 or Article 5 of this Ordinance <br /> if the basis for such menial involves an element or effort of the rtevelnnment that <br /> has been s nifinally addressed and approved in the MPD CZ Master Plan <br /> approval PFOGess, unless o-Re of the folloWinn Gonditiens apply <br /> (a) he demonstrated that theinformation presented to the Board of <br /> r��I�C�T,--,tea -a �,T <br /> County Gommissieners at the nnPn_rZ Master Plan approval Mane w <br /> as <br /> materially false o misleading, o <br /> (bb) Conditions have changed substantially On a manner that could not <br /> reasonably have been anticipated nr <br /> Orange County, North Carolina-Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.