Browse
Search
PRC agenda 03032021
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Parks and Recreation Council
>
Agendas
>
2021
>
PRC agenda 03032021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2021 2:24:21 PM
Creation date
2/26/2021 2:23:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
PRC meeting summary 03032021
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Parks and Recreation Council\Minutes\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks and Recreation Council <br /> DRAFT Meeting Summary <br /> Date: February 3, 2021 <br /> 6:30 p.m. <br /> Place: Virtual Meeting (via GoToMeeting) <br /> PRESENT: Bruce Chinery, Mikki Fleming; John Greeson; Cecily Kritz, Andrew Landstrom, <br /> Gina Reyman, Haywood Rhodes, Robert Smith; Tim Tippin; Michael Zelek; Xilong Zhao. Alice <br /> Armstrong (Chapel Hill P&G Commission liaison) <br /> STAFF: David Stancil, Beth Young <br /> I. Call to Order: Roll was called using by Chair Rhodes using the GoTo Meeting screen <br /> visuals. <br /> II. Additions or Changes to Agenda, Meeting Summary: February meeting notes will be <br /> provided at the March meeting. Chapel Hill liaison Alice Armstrong provided an email <br /> update that was forwarded to the Council. Additions to the agenda: None. <br /> III. Report of the Chair: Chair Rhodes asked Dave Stancil about any new PRC <br /> applications. Stancil will forward the applications to the PRC for consideration at the <br /> March 3rd meeting. <br /> IV. New Business <br /> a. Outside Agency Funding Request: The Council had received prior to the meeting three <br /> applications for outside agency funding, as well as the scorecard, scoring instructions <br /> and other documentation as requested. <br /> The Council discussed, reviewed and scored applications from the following agencies: <br /> Bridge II Sports, Piedmont Wildlife Center and Triangle Bikeworks. <br /> Bridge 2 Sports received a score of 90.8 from the council. While ranking highly, it was <br /> noted that the Council would find it helpful to see more prior year budgets and data. <br /> Piedmont Wildlife Center received a score of 83.1 from the council. <br /> Triangle Bikeworks received a score of 87.6 from the council. The Council felt that the <br /> program had high value, but noted the cost per unit/participant was substantial, and that <br /> the proposal was vague - more measurable outcomes would make application stronger. <br /> V. Old Business <br /> None <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.