Browse
Search
Planning Board - 030321
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2021
>
Planning Board - 030321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2021 8:42:39 AM
Creation date
2/25/2021 8:39:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Planning Board minutes - 030321
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
42 <br /> Michael Harvey <br /> From: Tom Altieri <br /> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 11:59 AM <br /> To: Perdita Holtz; Craig Benedict; Michael Harvey <br /> Cc: Elaina Cheek <br /> Subject: CP Locational Criteria, Appendix G -- RE: Ready for Craig's Review - Richardson <br /> rezoning - March 3, 2021 Planning Board <br /> I have reviewed the application, abstract and materials as well and have added a comment to the Abstract on S: <br /> I find the info Michael has provided to be accurate and I agree with his assessment and conclusion. Michael, if you wish <br /> to add my name to the Abstract,feel free. I am not sure I feel strongly either way but I think you are looking for <br /> indication that I have reviewed and that there is concurrence. While a Memo as an attachment to the materials could <br /> do that,the Comp Planning Division is internal to the Dept and obviously, not an outside agency or other County <br /> Dept. Just thinking that it is the Abstract that show's that Craig's Dept is speaking of one voice. Anyway, trying to <br /> provide you with what you need in a way that makes sense to me. I'm open to ideas and this email is me thinking out <br /> loud after reviewing the rezoning request and how best to offer input. Feel free to call me, if I can be more helpful. <br /> Following are the pertinent aspects (yellow highlight) of the Comp Plan to which I have made note on the Abstract and <br /> have included here for Craig's benefit and to help inform his PD Recommendation:. <br /> Appendix G:Land Use Classification and Overlay Locational Criteria <br /> The land use classifications and overlays are determined by a set of locational criteria specific to each classification. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.