Orange County NC Website
21 <br /> heard no staff analysis, and prior to the meeting a CfE board member circulated a letter in <br /> opposition to the project to all other CfE board members. She said it was not a fair hearing. <br /> Beth Trahos said the BOCC has received many requests to turn this proposal down. <br /> She said every proposal will have some trades off, as no project is perfect. She said the <br /> current zoning will have more negative environmental impacts. She said Efland has less <br /> density and less affluent residents than Chapel Hill, and Chapel Hill had to offer large incentives <br /> for Wegman's to come. She said Efland cannot make such deals, and the community will <br /> suffer while people wait for something perfect. She said Efland residents need opportunities, <br /> and more commercial tax base will help the County at large. She urged the BOCC to approve <br /> the plan, and looks forward to engaging on the project. <br /> Chair Price highlighted a letter in the BOCC packet from the CfE, requesting that this <br /> project be denied. She said the Town of Hillsborough has also sent a letter in the past stating <br /> concerns over the watershed. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin referred to page 2 of the abstract packet, and said there is a <br /> note that staff has been inquiring about preserving highway exit 160. He asked if there was a <br /> status update on this issue. <br /> Craig Benedict, Planning Director, said allowing access points for this project onto the <br /> existing exit ramp would require another review process by North Carolina Department of <br /> Transportation (NCDOT), which cannot happen until there is some adjudication of the <br /> application in front of the BOCC. He said this exit is part of federal highway system, so any <br /> NCDOR recommendation has to be reviewed by Federal Highway Commission. He said exit <br /> 160 east bound will stay as it is, and it is proposed to close the existing exit 160 west bound <br /> ramp, and move it to be the same as 161. He said the exits will be named together, with signs <br /> showing drivers which way to turn. He said the Federal Highway Commission system will <br /> create naming and signage. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if this explanation is any different to that which the BOCC <br /> has previously been presented. <br /> Craig Benedict said no, this information is consistent with what is in the application. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he wanted to respond to concerns about the possible <br /> relocation of Ben Johnston Road, which would only allow for right turns. He said currently <br /> traffic can turn both ways. <br /> Beth Trahos the Applicant has heard this concern from residents. She said NCDOT will <br /> not allow for full functioning at the current location of Ben Johnston. She said the Applicant <br /> thought about relocating Ben Johnston to align with the entrance drive into the Efland Station <br /> project, and thus act as a full access. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked if further discussion with NCDOT is merited. <br /> Beth Trahos said it is her understanding that NCDOT will not allow it, but referred the <br /> Engineer Earl Llewellyn, Kimley Horn. <br /> Earl Llewellyn recounted his conversation with NCDOT, and the current proximity of Ben <br /> Johnston is very close to the 1-40 ramps, and would present operational problems in the future. <br /> He said NCDOT asked that the site drive location be shifted farther north so there is better <br /> spacing of signals. He said this converted Ben Johnston to right in/right out movements. He <br /> said an unsignalized break in the median was explored, but is not possible due to traffic <br /> requirements. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked if there are other discussions to be had. He said he is <br /> concerned about no left turn off of Ben Johnston Road. <br /> Stan Beard, Applicant, said he recognizes the concerns from the neighbors. He said he <br /> has talked with a property owner, who also has land to the east of the 70 connector. He said <br /> the portion of Ben Johnston Road that would be relocated, is on this property owner's land. He <br /> said he has spoken with this landowner several times. He said Ben Johnston should be a full <br />