Orange County NC Website
14 <br /> residents under the bus. She said revenue can be generated by other businesses, and she <br /> argued that this project would never be contemplated if it were being proposed at a Chapel Hill <br /> or Hillsborough exit. She said the residents would not stand for it. She said there are many <br /> commercial opportunities to benefit Efland, but this is not one of them. <br /> Hope Thompson said she is a resident of Chapel Hill, studying Environmental Health at <br /> graduate school at UNC. She said she has lived in Durham and Orange counties her entire life. <br /> She said she is opposed to this rezoning request, and urged the BOCC to deny it. She said the <br /> health and environmental implications have been understated, and will prove harmful to the <br /> surrounding residents of Efland. <br /> Bonnie Hauser read the following comments: <br /> Good evening commissioners. Thank you for hearing the voices who know and care <br /> about Efland. I'm Bonnie Hauser. I sit on the boards of Orange County Schools and United <br /> Voice of Efland. Tonight, I am speaking for myself. I have been involved with the Efland <br /> community for a long time and join the community in its support for the rezoning proposal for <br /> Efland Station. <br /> Efland Station advances plans that community leaders and county planners have been <br /> working on for a long time. Those plans established this site as industrial because it sits <br /> between a busy interstate and an active rail line. Your board invested $4 million to bring sewer <br /> service to the site in order to attract businesses just like this. According to your planners, the <br /> project complies with county's strict lighting and noise ordinances, and exceeds your <br /> requirements for impervious surface and stormwater management. I'm not a hydrologist, but it <br /> appears that the project adds controls that will be better for the watersheds than doing nothing <br /> at all. <br /> Planners never imagined a large travel center on this site. That's why you are being <br /> asked to consider this new use and whether it works with the intent of the planners and your <br /> investments. I believe it does. But there are questions. You will need to resolve conflicting <br /> information that you are getting about hydrology and risk. There's also the strategic question. <br /> How does Buc-ee's plan to transition as cars eventually move away from fossil fuels? They are <br /> already planning 10 EV charging stations. Certainly they can't sell gas if no one is buying it. <br /> How many people in our County are already working as cashiers or custodians but not <br /> being paid a living wage? Please appreciate that opportunities like this don't come to Efland. <br /> Buc-ee's wants to invest $50 million in this small community. The project is estimated to <br /> generate over$1 million a year in local taxes, of which $350,000 will flow directly to our schools. <br /> That's in addition to nearly 200 living wage jobs in a small community that hosts two Title 1 <br /> schools. Buc-ee's has done everything you've asked and is not asking for any incentives. This is <br /> a big deal and the Efland community deserves their shot. Please approve this rezoning. Thank <br /> you. <br /> Jessica Sheffield said she is the Executive Director of the Eno River Association (ERA), <br /> which is opposed to the proposal in front of the BOCC that would allow for damaging impacts to <br /> Seven Mile Creek. She said the development would threaten what the State has already found <br /> to be a sensitive water way. She said Orange County must be careful what it allows to be built <br /> on this land. She said ERA is not anti-development, and seeks good development that <br /> preserves the environment. She said she has spoken to the developer and engineers involved <br /> with the project, who hoped she would support the project, but she cannot do so in good <br /> conscience. She said she must speak up for the neighbors, and to maintain the wild and open <br /> spaces to be resilient to climate change. She said ERA is concerned about sediment and heavy <br /> metals, which will be deposited. She said this project will not improve the community, and <br /> should not be permitted. She urged the BOCC to vote no. <br />