Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-21-2003-10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 10-21-2003
>
Agenda - 10-21-2003-10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:34:01 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:34:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20031021
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Upper Neuse Watershed Management Plan Appendix A <br />Development Ordinance Changes Recommended for <br />Orange County's subwatersheds <br />Orange County's jurisdiction within the Upper Neuse Watershed covers portions of six upland <br />drinking water supply watersheds; this land area constitutes approximately 25 percent of the Upper <br />Neuse Watershed. For each drinking water supply watershed, you will find a brief description of the <br />land area, existing regulations, and recommended changes to the development ordinance. First, <br />there are two important notes: <br />The TAC recommended testing two alternative management scenarios: 5-acre lot zoning and 3- <br />acre lot zoning with a small village allowed per township. A village was defined as a 50-acre area <br />developing under a high density option (up to 70 percent imperviousness). Although the 5-acre <br />lot zoning was the only scenario that absolutely met the non-degradation target (except for the <br />Lake Orange subwatershed where existing zoning is sufficient), for two subwatersheds (West Fork <br />Eno Corporation Lake, and Little River) the 3-acre lot zoning with village exceeded the water <br />quality target by only 1 to 2 µg/I of chlorophyll a which was deemed adequate to address the <br />target. Therefore, both are listed as meeting the target for these two subwatersheds. <br />2. Modeling demonstrated that Lake Ben )ohnston is more sensitive to alternative management <br />options. The Lake Ben Johnston subwatershed includes the West Fork Eno, Lake Orange, and <br />Corporation Lake subwatersheds and can therefore potentially be impacted by activities that <br />increase loading in those drainages. The West Fork Eno and Lake Orange reservoirs have more <br />storage than Corporation Lake and thus provide more nutrient trapping than Corporation Lake. <br />The trapping allows for different options to be selected for the West Fork Eno and Lake Orange <br />subwatersheds, while still protecting the downstream waters. However, if Orange County wishes <br />to meet the non-degradation target for the Lake Ben )ohnston drinkingwater supply, the <br />remaining drainage in the Corporation Lake subwatershed (i.e., the area below the West Fork <br />Eno and Lake Orange subwatersheds) and the direct drainage to Lake E3en Johnston should be <br />zoned at 1 unit per 5 acres and 5 percent maximum impervious area for new development, or <br />should meet the nitrogen loading performance standard of 1.7 Ibs/ac/yr and phosphorus loading <br />performance standard of 0.3 Ibs/ac/yr, rather than zoning for 1 unit per 3 acres with villages. <br />Northwest Upper Eno <br />Area in Orange County: 9.5 sq. mi. <br />2.4 percent of land area of Orange County <br />Existing development regulations: ORANGE <br />• 1 unit per 2 acres in Critical Area COUNTY <br />• 1 unit per acre and 12 percent impervious surface area maximum in <br />Protected Area <br />• Stream buffer approximately 100 feet <br />UNRBA May 2003 A-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.