Orange County NC Website
19 <br /> 1 issues. These `improvements' would likely have involve eliminating westbound Exit <br /> 2 160 to address public safety issues as traffic volumes increase in the area. <br /> 3 The elimination of westbound Exit 160/reconfiguration of Exit 161, requires additional <br /> 4 review as part of NC DOT and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) processes, <br /> 5 which are independent of this zoning atlas amendment process. <br /> 6 If approved, the project will move forward consistent with the master concept plan. If <br /> 7 denied, the applicant will have to address modification(s) at a future date. <br /> 8 As a practical matter, the processing of this rezoning request is the first step in this <br /> 9 process. <br /> 10 During our initial review of the Project, staff made the following recommendation(s) <br /> 11 concerning the proposed location of right-in/right-out driveway points (Attachment 4): <br /> 12 ➢ Eliminating the access drive(s) on the interstate on/off ramp west of US <br /> 13 Highway 70/1-85 Connector Road altogether; OR <br /> 14 ➢ Limit the two proposed access drives to an `entrance only' east of Mt. Willing <br /> 15 Road and an `exit only' west of the US Highway 70/1-85 connector road versus <br /> 16 a right-in/right-out for both driveways as current designed. <br /> 17 If the proposed access drives were eliminated altogether, motorists would access <br /> 18 Interstate 40/85 from the Project either via the US Highway 70/1-85 Connector Road <br /> 19 or Mt. Willing Road. Staff made this recommendation in an effort to preserve Exit 160 <br /> 20 as currently configured and reduce anticipated traffic conflicts. <br /> 21 NC DOT staff have indicated westbound Exit 160 may be <br /> 22 eliminated/relocated/redesigned to address anticipated traffic safety needs as traffic <br /> 23 volumes increase in the area. Further, the applicant expressed concern over not <br /> 24 having direct access to the Project via the on/off ramp. <br /> 25 Staff still believes there is merit to continue investigating limiting the proposed access <br /> 26 drives to be an `entrance only' and/or `exit only' thereby reducing potential vehicular <br /> 27 conflicts and continued study on preserving westbound Exit 160, recognizing the <br /> 28 ultimate decision on these components of the Project have to go through a separate <br /> 29 State and Federal review process. <br /> 30 ii. Installation of new traffic signals (i.e., new driveway/Exit 161 intersection with US Highway <br /> 31 70/1-85 Connector Road and the intersection of the 1-85/40 on/off ramp with Mt. Willing <br /> 32 Road) in Phase 1; <br /> 33 iii. Turning Ben Johnson Road into a `right turn only'. Vehicles attempting to access the <br /> 34 Interstate from Ben Johnson Road will turn right onto US Highway 70/1-85 Connector <br /> 35 Road, complete a U-turn at the proposed signal approximately 500 ft. north, and access <br /> 36 the Interstate via the existing on/off ramp. This work would be completed in Phase 1; <br /> 37 iv. Numerous roadway improvements (i.e. widening for adding of turning lanes, development <br /> 38 of traffic stops, etc.). <br /> 39 STAFF COMMENT. Both Planning and NC DOT staff have reviewed the proposal. <br /> 40 Comments are contained in Attachment 4. <br /> 41 Improvements will need to be made to Mt. Willing Road to accommodate the <br /> 42 current/anticipated traffic flow. County Comprehensive/Transportation Planning staff <br /> 43 have recommended a roadway design consistent with the approved Efland-Buckhorn- <br /> 44 Mebane Access Management Plan (EBM AMP). <br />