Agenda - 02-02-2021 Virtual Board Meeting; 8-a - Minutes

Browse Search

14 1 on a parcel zoned R-1; Undeveloped 6 acre parcel 2 zoned Office/Research and Manufacturing (O/RM); 3 South: Interstate 85/40; 4 West: Mt. Willing Road, restaurant and gas station on 5 parcels zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2), 6 Single-family residential land uses on parcels zoned 7 R-1; 8 East: US Highway 70/1-85 Connector Road and Ben 9 Johnson Road, large undeveloped parcels of 10 property zoned Agricultural Residential (AR). 11 MPD Conditional Zoning (CZ) Process: Involves review/action of a rezoning petition and a master 12 concept development plan allowing for the development of specific land use(s). Applications are 13 processed in a legislative manner (i.e., does not require sworn testimony or evidence) and 14 decisions are based on the BOCC's determination that the project is consistent with the purpose 15 and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 16 17 As this is a MPD-CZ proposal, a formal site plan is not required to be submitted. Applicants are 18 required to produce a concept plan consistent with the provisions of Section 6.7 of the Unified 19 Development Ordinance (UDO). The typical cadence for review is as follows: 20 First Action — Planning staff schedules a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM). 21 Staff Comment — DONE. This meeting was held in an on-line format on 22 September 15, 2020. Notes from this meeting are contained within Attachment 5. 23 Please note, staff held a follow-up information meeting on October 28, 2020 to 24 review modifications to the application package (i.e. name change, land use 25 buffer/access management changes, etc.). 26 • Second Action — The Planning Board reviews the application at a regular meeting and 27 makes a recommendation to the BOCC. 28 Staff Comment. The Planning Board completed its review of the Project at its 29 November 4, 2020 regular meeting, voting unanimously to recommend approval. 30 • Third Action — The BOCC receives the Planning Board recommendation and makes a 31 decision at a previously advertised public hearing. 32 Staff Comment— If the public hearing is held remotely, there is a 24-hour waiting 33 period required before a decision can be effective per State legislation regarding 34 virtual/remote meetings. The purpose of the 24-hour waiting period is to allow for 35 submission of written comments. 36 Per Section 2.9.2 (F) (3) of the UDO, mutually agreed upon conditions can be imposed as part 37 this process only if they address: 38 1. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, 39 2. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways and access points, parking, pedestrian and 40 vehicular circulation systems, screening and buffer areas, etc.) and/or 41 3. All other matters the County may find appropriate or the petitioner may propose.