Orange County NC Website
~~~~ <br />office development could be developed on <br />designation. <br />4 <br />this site under the Office/Institutional-1 zoning <br />Pro osed Amendment to the Joint Planning Area Zoning Atlas <br />The property owner has submitted a Zoning Atlas Amendment requesting that the site be rezoned <br />from the Residential-1 (R-1), Residential-2 (R-2), and Mixed-Use Office/Institutional-1 (MU OI- <br />1) zoning districts to the Residential-S-Conditional (R-S-C) zoning district. The Residential-5- <br />Conditional (R-S-C) zoning district allows a density of up to 15 units per acre. The owner has <br />submitted a Statement of Justification (attached) outlining voluntary limitations regarding the <br />future use of the site, if the Residential-S-Conditional (R-S-C) zoning is approved for this site, <br />including the following: <br />• A maximum density of 8.06 units per acre. <br />• Provisions to make 15% of units available to low-moderate income families. <br />Discussion <br />Analysis of this application is organized 4 4 of the Lan1deUse Management Ordinancelsha 1 not <br />Use Management Ordinance that Article <br />be amended except a) to correct a manifest error in the chapter; or b) because of changed or <br />changing conditions in a particular area or in the jurisdiction generally, or c) to achieve the <br />purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Accordingly, we provide the following analysis: <br />A) A rezoning is justified to correct a manifest error. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record to date can be summarized as follows: <br />Arguments in Support: We were unable to identify any arguments in support of a manifest error. <br />B) A rezoning is justified because of changed or changing conditions in a particular area or <br />in the jurisdiction generally. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record thus far can. be summarized as follows: <br />Arguments in Support: No arguments have been made to date in support of changed or changing <br />conditions in this particular area. <br />We note that the Chapel Hill Town Council has approved one development, Larkspur <br />Subdivision (approved February 25, 2002) within 500 feet of the Chapel Watch Village site <br />during the past 7 years. <br />