Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-15-2003-3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 10-15-2003
>
Agenda - 10-15-2003-3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:35:16 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:34:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/15/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20031015
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~~~ <br />office development could be developed on <br />designation. <br />4 <br />this site under the Office/Institutional-1 zoning <br />Pro osed Amendment to the Joint Planning Area Zoning Atlas <br />The property owner has submitted a Zoning Atlas Amendment requesting that the site be rezoned <br />from the Residential-1 (R-1), Residential-2 (R-2), and Mixed-Use Office/Institutional-1 (MU OI- <br />1) zoning districts to the Residential-S-Conditional (R-S-C) zoning district. The Residential-5- <br />Conditional (R-S-C) zoning district allows a density of up to 15 units per acre. The owner has <br />submitted a Statement of Justification (attached) outlining voluntary limitations regarding the <br />future use of the site, if the Residential-S-Conditional (R-S-C) zoning is approved for this site, <br />including the following: <br />• A maximum density of 8.06 units per acre. <br />• Provisions to make 15% of units available to low-moderate income families. <br />Discussion <br />Analysis of this application is organized 4 4 of the Lan1deUse Management Ordinancelsha 1 not <br />Use Management Ordinance that Article <br />be amended except a) to correct a manifest error in the chapter; or b) because of changed or <br />changing conditions in a particular area or in the jurisdiction generally, or c) to achieve the <br />purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Accordingly, we provide the following analysis: <br />A) A rezoning is justified to correct a manifest error. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record to date can be summarized as follows: <br />Arguments in Support: We were unable to identify any arguments in support of a manifest error. <br />B) A rezoning is justified because of changed or changing conditions in a particular area or <br />in the jurisdiction generally. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record thus far can. be summarized as follows: <br />Arguments in Support: No arguments have been made to date in support of changed or changing <br />conditions in this particular area. <br />We note that the Chapel Hill Town Council has approved one development, Larkspur <br />Subdivision (approved February 25, 2002) within 500 feet of the Chapel Watch Village site <br />during the past 7 years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.