Orange County NC Website
16 <br />oneae<~: Say 6sb (~~nx exprnaea) <br />Inclndee feel (516,000), firWshlvge ($1,600), aupplioe (51,]00), phone (5350), alectriuity <br />($5,000), er~dmeintrnanca (515,(100). - <br />• Revenue~S55 <br />II is assumM that the transfer sladon would munWin the same lipp~nx Fee as she landfill, <br />hOweveq wml land ie pucchaned and the design and wnstruction coem acekwwn it ie <br />dlRrcWLLO estimate tipping kas and revenue. Webelieve there mighv ba soma revrnue <br />generated beyond dtat regoved to fund operations mtd capitalivefion, however, it ie safe <br />to asaumelhat any smplua revenue would be aigr~ dy leas Wan that now generated <br />per tonby the landfill. CLnomers would gain savings in transportafion <br />wets/convctience; Mwevcr, these savings would vat be attributabl<ro the Sohd Wmte <br />Management Department Additional savings wouldresultfrom delay landfill dosvrc <br />and Eubanks Rd. hmafer station corehuc[ion and operation costs. <br />Possible Advmtaea <br />• Short¢travcl diNavec to disposal sikfor was[c haulers from the nosthzrn part ofNe <br />County, <br />Reduction oftruck vafficun l-dq old NC 86, old vnd new lIwy. 86 and the Eubanks <br />Read err <br />• Reduced wckteaffctluough doxmtown Hillsborough, <br />• There azelvWted waste sssavagemaMfatilitics in the uorthem end ofihe wunty now, <br />• Anortbem rcanslu Bite eoWd wntwueto operate Wror <loemo ottM cmrav[Imdfp <br />pmjwtW for FY 2006-0], <br />• Passible synergy with an ex¢tmg conv®iwce center site coultl redoes opamtlonW <br />oat by wmbining the two firvctions (depending on whma located), <br />• Perception ofmora equitable M1osling ofwlid waste Taulitias by Enb¢Nce Road <br />unity. <br />• Could delay IandEll closure and eswciazed costa for m edditienelbudgct year, <br />• Conld delay new EUbavka transfer station conbwcuon for an additional year, <br />Eomwmie Developmwt Dievict orPreswtlYOwned ComN Property such as Seven <br />• Mile Creek meYbe possible sitq <br />Wonld allow County to expedm®I mW become familiar with tramsPamng waste, and <br />• Could result inaslighdy arnalla rcausfu station au Eubanks AOed. <br />Possible Dieatlvavtaaes <br />• Siting any sotidwana facilitycm ba difScWt and opposition can be asswned, <br />• WoWd result in nagligble opare~ional savings az Eubanks Roed landfill, and <br />ToNI ooats for operating n lwdfill and tsansfer station will exoeed the ws[ for only e <br />• landfill. <br />