Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-01-2001-5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 10-01-2001
>
Agenda - 10-01-2001-5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 3:20:53 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:34:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/1/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20011001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br />oneae<~: Say 6sb (~~nx exprnaea) <br />Inclndee feel (516,000), firWshlvge ($1,600), aupplioe (51,]00), phone (5350), alectriuity <br />($5,000), er~dmeintrnanca (515,(100). - <br />• Revenue~S55 <br />II is assumM that the transfer sladon would munWin the same lipp~nx Fee as she landfill, <br />hOweveq wml land ie pucchaned and the design and wnstruction coem acekwwn it ie <br />dlRrcWLLO estimate tipping kas and revenue. Webelieve there mighv ba soma revrnue <br />generated beyond dtat regoved to fund operations mtd capitalivefion, however, it ie safe <br />to asaumelhat any smplua revenue would be aigr~ dy leas Wan that now generated <br />per tonby the landfill. CLnomers would gain savings in transportafion <br />wets/convctience; Mwevcr, these savings would vat be attributabl<ro the Sohd Wmte <br />Management Department Additional savings wouldresultfrom delay landfill dosvrc <br />and Eubanks Rd. hmafer station corehuc[ion and operation costs. <br />Possible Advmtaea <br />• Short¢travcl diNavec to disposal sikfor was[c haulers from the nosthzrn part ofNe <br />County, <br />Reduction oftruck vafficun l-dq old NC 86, old vnd new lIwy. 86 and the Eubanks <br />Read err <br />• Reduced wckteaffctluough doxmtown Hillsborough, <br />• There azelvWted waste sssavagemaMfatilitics in the uorthem end ofihe wunty now, <br />• Anortbem rcanslu Bite eoWd wntwueto operate Wror <loemo ottM cmrav[Imdfp <br />pmjwtW for FY 2006-0], <br />• Passible synergy with an ex¢tmg conv®iwce center site coultl redoes opamtlonW <br />oat by wmbining the two firvctions (depending on whma located), <br />• Perception ofmora equitable M1osling ofwlid waste Taulitias by Enb¢Nce Road <br />unity. <br />• Could delay IandEll closure and eswciazed costa for m edditienelbudgct year, <br />• Conld delay new EUbavka transfer station conbwcuon for an additional year, <br />Eomwmie Developmwt Dievict orPreswtlYOwned ComN Property such as Seven <br />• Mile Creek meYbe possible sitq <br />Wonld allow County to expedm®I mW become familiar with tramsPamng waste, and <br />• Could result inaslighdy arnalla rcausfu station au Eubanks AOed. <br />Possible Dieatlvavtaaes <br />• Siting any sotidwana facilitycm ba difScWt and opposition can be asswned, <br />• WoWd result in nagligble opare~ional savings az Eubanks Roed landfill, and <br />ToNI ooats for operating n lwdfill and tsansfer station will exoeed the ws[ for only e <br />• landfill. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.