Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
6 <br /> Janice Tyler said if it is not required by state statute, she would recommend doing away <br /> with the designations. <br /> Commissioner Price said if the statute requires the designations, then they should <br /> remain, but the overall numbers can be reduced. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said her recommendation was for 13, due to the difficulty in filling <br /> positions. She said staff can figure out designations, and it would probably be best to keep two <br /> boards, but reduce each committee to 10 members. <br /> Chair Rich echoed Commissioner Dorosin's concern regarding the difficulty in filling <br /> these boards. She said she would like to revisit these boards if the difficulty continues. <br /> Thomas Freeman-Stuart said Covid-19 has prevented visits to these facilities, and asked <br /> if enticing applicants will be even more difficult than it already was. <br /> Victor Orija said Covid has made things difficult, but there are volunteers who really love <br /> to serve in this capacity, and he is hopeful for the future. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Greene to <br /> keep the committees separate and reduce the number of positions to ten (10) total for both the <br /> Nursing Home Community Advisory Committee and the Adult Care Home Community Advisory <br /> Committee. <br /> Chair Rich called each Commissioner by name (roll call). <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> b. Discussion and Acceptance of the FY 2020-25 County Capital Investment Plan <br /> The Board discussed the updated outstanding amendments to the Capital Investment <br /> Plan, and considered voting to approve the acceptance of the FY 2020-25 County Capital <br /> Investment Plan (CIP). <br /> Travis Myren, Deputy County Manager, reviewed the item below: <br /> BACKGROUND: During the Intent to Adopt Budget work session on June 9, 2020, the Board <br /> approved amendments to the Capital Investment Plan that advanced the expansion of the <br /> Durham Technical Community College and amended several projects in Year 1 (FY 2020-21) <br /> intended to offset the cost of advancing that project. <br /> The Board postponed making decisions on proposed project amendments in Years 2 through <br /> 5 that are intended to more fully offset the cost of advancing the Durham Tech Expansion <br /> project into Years 1 — 3. The Board reviewed the proposed amendments at the September 10, <br /> 2020 work session, and provided direction to staff. At that time, the Board reached consensus <br /> on all of the amendments as represented in Attachment 1 with the exception of a $250,000 <br /> reduction in vehicle replacements in years 2 and 3. Therefore, Attachment 1 contains two <br /> options. The first option is to implement the $250,000 reductions in Years 2 and 3. The second <br /> option eliminates those reductions. <br /> The Vehicle Replacement project in the Capital Investment Plan has been used to replace <br /> public safety vehicles. As a result, the $250,000 reduction in Years 2 and 3 would result in the <br /> replacement of fewer vehicles in Emergency Services and the Sheriff's Office. If the reduction <br /> were balanced evenly across those two agencies, Emergency Services would forgo one <br /> ambulance remount or three supervisory vehicles scheduled for replacement over this two <br />