Orange County NC Website
6 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 2200 Homestead Road (Center for Community Self-Help): $817,080 <br /> 3 Community Partner(s): CASA, Community Home Trust, Habitat for Humanity <br /> 4 Funds will be used to develop infrastructure and site improvements at 2200 Homestead Road to <br /> 5 prepare individual parcels for construction of approximately 117 affordable rental and affordable <br /> 6 homeownership units. Site development includes demolition of an existing vacant building, site <br /> 7 grading and paving, installing water, sewer, and storm water infrastructure, and construction of <br /> 8 community amenities, such as greenways, open spaces, sidewalks, outdoor seating, community <br /> 9 garden, basketball court, and landscaping throughout the site. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Applicant Funding Request <br /> 12 Center for Community Self-Help $ 1,500,000 <br /> 13 EmPOWERment, Inc. $ 700,000 <br /> 14 Habitat for Humanity of Orange County $ 1,500,000 <br /> 15 Interchurch Council Housing Corp $ 165,840 <br /> 16 Total $ 3,865,840 <br /> 17 <br /> 18 The Affordable Housing Advisory Board (AHAB) reviewed the applications for the 2020 <br /> 19 Affordable Housing Bond Program on August 18, 2020 and scored the applications using the <br /> 20 evaluation scorecard approved by the Commissioners earlier this year (see Attachment 3). <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Based on these scores and discussion of the projects, the County Manager proposes the <br /> 23 following funding recommendations: <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Applicant Funding Request <br /> 26 Center for Community Self-Help $ 817,080 <br /> 27 EmPOWERment, Inc. $ 700,000 <br /> 28 Habitat for Humanity of Orange County $ 817,080 <br /> 29 Interchurch Council Housing Corp $ 165,840 <br /> 30 Total $ 2,500,000 <br /> 31 <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the scorecard in attachment 1 could be explained. He <br /> 34 said some agencies received 52 points for leveraging, and this is confusing. <br /> 35 Erika Brandt said it is a confusing category title, as it involves other criteria as well. She <br /> 36 said maximum points from leveraging is 20, but there are other criteria in that category that can <br /> 37 allow for the accrual of points, up to 35. <br /> 38 Commissioner Dorosin said those are yes or no questions, and there is no difference <br /> 39 between affordability percentages. <br /> 40 Erika Brandt said the scorecard is a tool, and certain scores were up to the Affordable <br /> 41 Housing Advisory Board (AHAB) members. <br /> 42 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if there is a formula for how the cost per unit was <br /> 43 calculated. <br /> 44 Erika Brandt said the scorecard did not include a scoring for the number of units. She <br /> 45 said Allison Mahaley is also present from the Affordable Housing Advisory Board. <br /> 46 Allison Mahaley said each AHAB member scored the applications on his or her own, and <br /> 47 then reached consensus as a board for a score for each application. She said there was <br /> 48 lengthy discussion. <br /> 49 Commissioner Price said in the first section it said agencies could score a maximum of <br /> 50 20 for leveraging, but the next page showed another possible 35 points. She said this is <br /> 51 confusing. <br />