Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
16 <br /> 1 Slide #6 <br /> 2 9auNary Companw <br /> 3 - <br /> 4BouMary <br /> 6 <br /> 7 ~� <br /> 9 <br /> 10 ...- <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Slide #7 <br /> 14 Recommendation15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 1. Adopt the Resolution in Attachment 4 which approves designating the <br /> 11 parcels(totaling 31.88 acres)in question as being located within <br /> 18 the"Primary Service Area"for water and sewer services on the map <br /> 19 in Appendix A of the WASMPBA. <br /> 20 feedback Provide <br /> policy for resolving minor discrepancies <br /> 21 in the policy <br /> 22 would need <br /> . . . . <br /> ,. . <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that this item is about 2 lots, and the other nine are <br /> 26 already hooked up. <br /> 27 Perdita Holtz said essentially it is 2 lots, which already have stub outs, but need service. <br /> 28 She said the additional 9 are being added for consistency. <br /> 29 Commissioner Dorosin asked if these two lots were stubbed out prior to the boundary <br /> 30 agreement being made. <br /> 31 Perdita Hotlz said service to the subdivision began in 1997, but in 2000 the Town of <br /> 32 Chapel Hill was working on its comprehensive plan, and pulled back the urban service boundary <br /> 33 at that time. She said the preexisting stubs outs were not taken into account, and she does not <br /> 34 know why. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 A motion was made by Commissioner Marcoplos, seconded by Commissioner Price to <br /> 37 adopt the resolution which approves designating the 11 parcels (totaling 31.88 acres) in <br /> 38 question as being located within the "Primary Service Area" for water and sewer services on the <br /> 39 map in Appendix A of the WASMPBA. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Chair Rich called each Commissioner by name (roll call). <br /> 42 <br /> 43 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Chair Rich said the discussion can now move to the second part of the item. <br /> 46 Commissioner Greene said she heard that other districts are in favor of pursuing a <br /> 47 policy, but she is not. She said these boundaries were drawn with great deliberation, and <br /> 48 should come back to the Board on a case by case basis. She said she is really opposed to an <br /> 49 abstract policy on these matters. <br />