Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
15 <br /> - <br /> Brief Overview <br /> •WASMPBA adopted in December 2001 to establish water and sewer service <br /> boundaries and other relevant parameters <br /> • Five parties: <br /> •Towns of Chapel Hill, Carrboro,and Hillsborough <br /> • Orange County <br /> • OWASA(Orange Water and Sewer Authority] <br /> 1 • In February,a petition was received from two property owners within <br /> Chapel Hill's ETJ(Extraterritorial Jurisdiction)requesting that two lots be <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> added to"Primary Service Area" <br /> •All five parties to the agreement must approve changes such as this. <br /> SlideAmendment Map <br /> 17 <br /> 37. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> Location <br /> • •Vicinity Map in Attachment 2 shows <br /> zoomed out location -southeast <br /> • Chapel Hill. <br /> 1 •2 lots pertaining to petition are <br /> undeveloped by have water and <br /> sewer stub outs. <br /> 22 <br /> •Staffs recommended that 9 <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> 25 <br /> additional lots (11 total)in the <br /> same subdivision also be added to � <br /> Primary Service Area. <br /> • Already served by OWASA water and <br /> sewer lines <br /> • — <br /> Slide27 <br /> 28 •4 <br /> • Process <br /> 1 <br /> 31 <br /> 32 <br /> • Initiated by Town of Chapel Hill since lots are within Town's ETJ <br /> 33 <br /> • Review Schedule: <br /> • Chapel Hill October 28(approved) <br /> i35 <br /> • Hillsborough November 9(approved) <br /> • Carrboro-November 10(approved) <br /> • OWASA November 12(approved) <br /> • • Orange County November 17 <br /> 37 <br /> •Town of Chapel Hill's resolution requested that the governing <br /> 38 <br /> 39 <br /> boards of the Town of Carrboro,the Town of Hillsborough, Orange <br /> County,and OWASA consider approval of the amendment. <br /> ' 1 <br /> 41 Slide <br /> 42 <br /> 43 <br /> Potential Map Interpretation Policy - <br /> Feedback Request <br /> .. <br /> •Staff requests feedback on whether the staffs of the 5 WASMPBA parties <br /> '46 <br /> should commence work on a potential policy for resolving minor <br /> discrepancies in the future through GIS analysis and staff interpretation, <br /> 47 <br /> 48 <br /> rather than through the existing process which requires formal action by <br /> each of the five governing boards. <br /> • If authorized, staffs would work together on language and bring an item <br /> i • <br /> forward for future consideration. <br /> • Parameters expected to include consideration of future land use <br /> 1 categories and existing zoning,serviceability,amount of land affected, <br /> and distance from existing similar WASMPBA designation (Primary <br /> Service Area vs. Long-Term Interest Area) <br />