Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-11-2001-5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 09-11-2001
>
Agenda - 09-11-2001-5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 5:12:52 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:34:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/11/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br />ooemdons: 539.650 (retuning axpmsex) <br />lucludes ftal ($16,000A NrWsltivgs ($1,600), avpplica (54,]00), phone ($350), clectdciry <br />(55,000), and mafntmmce ($15,000). ' <br />• Rcvmua. $$$ <br />II is azsum<d Nat Ne kwsfer station would mamlain the same tipping fee az the landfill, <br />however, tmtil laud is purchased wd Nc dtsign and construbtiev costs are known it is <br />diffiaWtN eatimeta tipping fees and revenuer. We bclievo lho-atmght be soma rovenue <br />generated beyond Nat requires to fund operations and capitalization, fiowever, i[ is safe <br />to assume Nat wy surylus revwue would be sifyificwtty laser Nm that vow genern[ed <br />per ran by Nelmdfill. Cusmmers would gWn savingswhansportation <br />wsts/twvwienee; howevu, these savings would no[ be aMbutable m Ne Solid Wvate <br />Mwagavmt DepasMmt. Additional saviug¢would result from delayed Iwdfill etwurc <br />and Eubanks Rd. nnnskr station crostrwtiov and operation costs. <br />Poseiblc Advent&geb <br />9hotar travel distance to d(sposal she for was[ehaulas ]iom Ne noMem part ofNe <br />Cowry, <br />• Reduction of lnwk tratic on l-40, old NC 86, old ai new Hwy. 86 avd We EUbavks <br />Roatl area, <br />• AeducM truck hefficthrough dowmtown Hillsbomugb, <br />• There are Imvted orate menvganmt fadlitles in Ne noM®md ofdu worry vow, <br />• Anorthem nmsfa sia cold emSnuem operate after clusurc of[M1e current landfill <br />projected for PY 2006-0], <br />• PossiblesnergywiN au existing covveviewe carte site coWd reduce opaafioml <br />wst by coinbiNng Ne two fwctiovs (depevdmg mwhae locvt~7, <br />• Peseptien afmore equitable hoeNtg o(eahd waste faciktiee by EUbaoke ROad <br />wiry, <br />• Could delay lwdfill dosum and associazd coati forwadN[iowlbudget yeaz, <br />Could delayvew Pubavks tmnsftt s+atitn constrvc0on for m additiwal year, <br />Economic Development District orpresently owned Cowtypmperty sucb az Seven <br />Mile Crmkmaybe possible site, <br />• Would allow Cowtyto experiment and becomef iliaz wiN NmaferringwaAe, and <br />• Could result in aslightly smaller hanefa stazion on Eubanks Rpad. <br />Pwsible Diaedvwtaeca <br />Siting wy solid waste facility cm be didcnlt wd oppasitiw cav be gsatwed, <br />• WouldrceultWvcgligiblc opcrarimalaavWge at EUbaNra ROadlmdfill,aM <br />• total coetsfor opecaWgalmdfill and tramfer station will ezecrA the cost tar oNya <br />Iwdfll. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.