Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-01-2003-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 10-01-2003
>
Agenda - 10-01-2003-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 2:54:21 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:34:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/1/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20031001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-133 Amendments to Open Space Standards for Flexible Development Subdivisions
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br />sewer infrastructure will allow minimum lot sizes of 14,000 square feet. The open space <br />requirement should add value to the urban development, but not significantly decrease <br />density, nor allow additional lots. In some cases, a developer may increase densities by <br />dedicating off-site additional open space (Section G, Sudivision Ordinance), or on- or <br />off-site affordable housing, thereby restoring any lost lots caused by the open space <br />ordinance amendment. <br />Residents of cluster subdivisions in the Urban Boundary will benefit from the proposed <br />amendment by the provision of nearby recreation amenities. The cluster subdivision may <br />be used in both the rural and urban areas, but it will continue to look very different <br />depending on the minimum lot sizes and open space uses. <br />It is not expected that these changes will significantly reduce lots in either setting. <br />Examples using existing subdivision plans were provided at the public meeting, showing <br />that the effect this amendment would have on total lot potential is expected to be small. <br />In the examples, the number of lots that would be removed to meet the standard were a <br />small percentage of the total number. If these subdivision plans had been designed using <br />the proposed open space guidelines from the beginning, it may have been possible to <br />reduce the number of lost lots even further, or perhaps to even retain all lots through <br />improved site design. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.