Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: October 1, 2003 <br />Action Ager~d <br />Item No. <br />SUBJECT: Amendments to Open Space Standards for Flexible Development Subdivisions <br />DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections <br />PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />Ordinance as Recommended by Planning Board and <br />Administration <br />Questions and Answers from Public Hearing <br />Minutes from May 27, 2003 Public Hearing <br />Minutes from August 6, 2003 Planning Board Meeting <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Craig Benedict, Director, ext. 2592 <br />Robert P. Davis, Planner III, ext 2580 <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Hillsborough 732-8181 <br />Chapel Hill 968-4501 <br />Durham 688-7331 <br />Mebane (336)227-2031 <br />PURPOSE: To close public hearing and consider proposed amendments to the Open Space <br />Standards in subdivisions following the Flexible Development option. <br />BACKGROUND: Flexible Development, Section IV-B-10 of the Subdivision Regulations, was <br />adopted on July 1, 1996. Section C of the regulations requires that Flexible Subdivisions set aside <br />a minimum of 33% of the total project acreage as protected open space. The current open space <br />regulations set forth the required compositional elements for both Primary and Secondary <br />Conservation Areas and, to a lesser degree, guidelines relating to open space shape design. <br />The intent of the proposed amendments is to improve the layout of open space by making it more <br />accessible to the public and property owners for vistas or use. This is in response to concerns that <br />some of the more recent subdivision proposals lacked in the goal of preserving the County's rural <br />character and, in appropriate cases, accessibility. These amendments address the primary <br />negative design criteria in the current regulations, that being the creation of large blocks of more <br />urban-style lots unbroken by natural areas and lacking open space connectivity. <br />These amendments were presented at the May 27, 2003 Public Hearing and comments were <br />received from the Board of County Commissioners and Planning Board members. The following <br />changes were made in the ordinance amendment text in response to those comments. <br />Public Hearing <br />1. The classification of `Pedestrian Access Paths' in Section C.3.c `Secondary Conservation <br />Areas' has been changed in name to `Pedestrian Open Space Area' (POSA). It has been <br />explicitly stated in the text that this designation does not require the construction of an <br />improved path, but must only be: a) 50-feet wide; b) in common ownership; c) undeveloped <br />except for recreational amenities, and d) reasonably traversable by foot. The determination <br />of when pedestrian improvements should be required in a POSA will be determined on a <br />case-by-case analysis of the overall open space goals of the proposed subdivision taking the <br />