Browse
Search
Minutes 10-20-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Minutes 10-20-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2020 12:06:43 PM
Creation date
11/18/2020 12:01:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/20/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 4-a - Resolution of Recognition for Judicial District 15-B Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Carl R. Fox Upon His Retirement
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 4-b - Resolution Honoring and Remembering Reverend Robert E. Seymour
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 4-c - Resolution Regarding the Hyde Amendment
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 6-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 8-a - Minutes
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 8-b - Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #2
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 8-c - North Carolina Governor’s Highway Safety Program – Orange County Sheriff’s Office Traffic Safety Project and Approval of Budget Amendment #2-A
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 8-d - North Carolina Housing Finance Agency (NCHFA) Urgent Repair Program (URP20) Award and Updates to ESFRLP20 Assistance Policy
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 8-e - Advisory Boards and Commissions – Appointments
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 8-f - Change in BOCC Meeting Schedule for 2020
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Agenda - 10-20-20; 12-1 - Information Item - October 6, 2020 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-20-20 Virtual Business Meeting
ORD-2020-022 Ordinance Amending The Orange County Zoning Atlas
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2020
ORD-2020-023 Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #2
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2020
ORD-2020-024 North Carolina Governor’s Highway Safety Program – Orange County Sheriff’s Office Traffic Safety Project and Approval of Budget Amendment #2-A
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2020
OTHER-2020-010 Statement of Consistency of A Proposed Unified Development Ordinance Map Amendment w-Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan - Applicant initiated Amendment rezone 3 parcels
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2020
OTHER-2020-011 Orange County Assistance Policy Urgent Repair Program 2020
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2020
OTHER-2020-012 Orange County Assistance Policy Essential Single-Family Rehabilitation Loan Pool 2020
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2020
OTHER-2020-013 Orange County Procurement and Disbursement Policy Urgent Repair and Housing Rehabilitation Programs
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2020
RES-2020-063 Resolution of Recognition for Judicial District 15-B Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Carl R. Fox Upon His Retirement
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2020
RES-2020-064 Resolution Honoring and Remembering Reverend Robert E. Seymour
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2020
RES-2020-065 Resolution Calling for Repeal of the Hyde Amendment and Supporting the Right of All Women to Safe and Comprehensive Health Care
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2020
RES-2020-066 North Carolina Governor's Highway Safety Program - Local Government Resolution
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if the BOCC could potentially rezone it at some point. <br /> Michael Harvey said yes, as long as LIDO notifications requirements are followed. <br /> Commissioner Price referred to the red-hatched areas on the map, with reduced buffers. <br /> She said it is hard to tell what is going on in the map, but it appears a road will go right through <br /> the protected area. She said she was adamant about preserving the 100-foot buffer, and asked <br /> if staff was in favor of allowing pavement in this area, even with potential run off issues, etc. <br /> Michael Harvey said if one looks at the totality of the County land use development <br /> regulations and storm water standards, the staff is confident that existing regulatory standards <br /> would address any potential impact. He said as it relates to the potential access road, the <br /> reduction of the buffer makes perfect sense to staff because it would allow the road to go at a <br /> narrower portion of the floodplain, than if it were further back. He said this option is a much <br /> better arrangement. He said the other area with reduced buffer showed no negative impacts, <br /> and staff saw fit to agree with the request. <br /> Commissioner Price said the Board purposefully put in a 100-foot buffer, but staff <br /> disregarded that recommendation and she said she wants to understand staff's reasoning. <br /> Michael Harvey said the BOCC can certainly disagree with staff, and insist on the 100 <br /> foot buffer. <br /> Commissioner McKee said the BOCC has received emails from the public regarding the <br /> 125 buffers that were agreed upon at the Settlers Point property. <br /> Michael Harvey said these buffers were agreed upon during negotiations at the BOCC <br /> meeting, and the 125 buffer was along the southern portion of the property only. <br /> Commissioner McKee said there has been some confusion with the public who thought <br /> that a 125 buffer would be the starting point for this project, but he said that would only be the <br /> case if it was under the Settlers Point construct. He said this is a different application, and the <br /> BOCC is not required to start with 125 foot buffer. <br /> Michael Harvey said that is correct. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he wanted clarification, as there is some confusion amongst <br /> the public. He said it is his understanding that the BOCC must start with the LIDO requirements <br /> for this property, and negotiate from there. <br /> Michael Harvey said that is correct. <br /> Commissioner Greene said she understands the 50-foot buffer that runs east west, as <br /> this one makes sense to her. She said she is less understanding of the north south 50-foot <br /> buffer that runs in the northwest corner of the property. <br /> Michael Harvey said he understands this concern. He said the Applicant requested <br /> flexibility, and staff agreed to it. He said if the BOCC disagrees, and wants the 100-foot buffer, it <br /> can deny the requested flexibility. <br /> Chair Rich asked if the map showing the need for the access point could be shown. <br /> Frank Csapo presented an access point map. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said there is a road going around a parking lot in the <br /> northwestern corner of the property, and asked if this is within the 50-foot buffer. <br /> Frank Csapo said the road is not within the buffer, but some of the parking spaces are. <br /> He said the Developer has been trying to be creative, per Commissioner Dorosin's request. He <br /> said the land to the west of this parking area is not developable, per County ordinance, and so it <br /> was chosen as an area for buffer reduction as the impact on neighboring properties would be <br /> minimal, due to the fact that development will not happen on the neighboring property. <br /> Frank Csapo said the other buffer reduction, running east-west in the southern portion of <br /> the property has been requested as the crossing of a floodplain must be done on the <br /> perpendicular. He said to do this further in would require a much larger portion of the floodplain <br /> be crossed, and the impact will be much less if it is done lower down with a 50-foot buffer. <br /> Chair Rich asked if the distance of the building from the property edge could be <br /> identified. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.