Orange County NC Website
15 <br /> said it is also necessitated by the fact that the Applicant has withdrawn access off of Davis Road <br /> making internal access more important. <br /> Chair Rich said Michael Harvey could continue to review the abstract. <br /> Michael Harvey did so, and then reviewed portions of the Statement of Consistency <br /> showing that the proposal is in line with the land use plans established for this area between the <br /> County and the Town of Hillsborough. <br /> Commissioner Greene referred to the 30% green space, and asked if this includes the <br /> storm water impoundment area. <br /> Michael Harvey said yes. <br /> Commissioner Greene asked if the storm-water impoundment area would be visually <br /> attractive. <br /> Michael Harvey said yes. <br /> Frank Csapo said the storm water impoundment areas would be visual add-ons to <br /> wildlife buffers and/or close to the existing floodplain area. <br /> Commissioner Greene said it would be helpful to see this on a map. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if Michael Harvey could go through the items that were <br /> revised. He said Davis Road access was a point of contention, but this road will now only be <br /> used for emergency vehicles. <br /> Michael Harvey said that is correct, and no commercial traffic will exit on this road. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said another issue was the building heights, and this has been <br /> addressed in the review of the abstract. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said the 100-foot setback was discussed previously, and after <br /> looking at the map (agenda item 6-a; 1), it appears the buffers are 100 feet almost everywhere, <br /> with two exceptions: the area that runs east to west, and another was north to south in the <br /> northwest edge of the property. He said these areas are marked with red hatching, and the <br /> buffers will go to 50 feet in these two areas to accommodate parking or access roads. He <br /> asked if the access roads are new roads that were being proposed. <br /> Michael Harvey said those roads are shown. He said the Applicant requested a <br /> relaxation of the 100-foot buffer where it made sense, especially in the southern portion. He <br /> said a 100-foot buffer in this area would cause issues with the floodplain, and thus the reduction <br /> of the buffer will allow the road placement to have less of an impact on the floodplain. He said <br /> the situation is the same in the northwest part of the property, and the Applicant requested a <br /> buffer reduction here to allow for access to be granted in area that would be less visual and <br /> intrusive to surrounding properties. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said it would be helpful to see the map showing where these <br /> roads will be. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he has received several calls on this item. He said the <br /> Board went through many of the issues with Settlers Point. He said that project was approved <br /> but was never built. He asked if this project gets approved, but does not get built, is there any <br /> significance in the changes being made to these parcels. <br /> Michael Harvey said the general public should remember the Applicant could develop <br /> the parcels of property under the existing Settlers Point proposal. He said this Applicant has <br /> chosen to modify the existing conditions, which would also include the extra 12-acre parcel on <br /> Davis Road. He said if the BOCC approves the project, it revises the conditions, and would <br /> allow additional floor area than Settlers Point; a different parking standard; would only allow for <br /> a 40 foot building on the Davis Road property; would require the same perimeter buffers, with <br /> the exception of the two previously mentioned areas; would not permit a driveway access on <br /> Davis Road; and would preserve the same amount of open space. He said the land uses are <br /> slightly different, but the same protections at Settlers Point will be incorporated here. He said if <br /> the BOCC approves this item, the conditions will govern development of this property in <br /> perpetuity, unless the land were rezoned or one seeks to amend these conditions. <br />