Orange County NC Website
19 <br /> 1 Frank Csapo agreed. <br /> 2 Commissioner Dorosin said there are over 300 spaces throughout the entire area, but <br /> 3 asked if the number in the red-hatched zone could be identified. <br /> 4 Frank Csapo said approximately 35. <br /> 5 Commissioner Dorosin said this does not include any being in the blue zone. <br /> 6 Frank Csapo said that is correct. <br /> 7 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the Applicant would consider reducing this area to 16 <br /> 8 spaces. <br /> 9 Commissioner Marcoplos said he thought that no buildings could go in the floodplain, but <br /> 10 that parking could, and he wanted to reduce the number of parking spaces in the red-hatched <br /> 11 area in the northwest corner. <br /> 12 Chair Rich said she hears general consensus around the reduced buffer in the southern <br /> 13 portion of the property, but concern over the northwestern portion. She asked if it would hurt the <br /> 14 project to lose the parking spaces in the northwestern area. <br /> 15 Frank Csapo said yes it does, because the Applicant has already given up parking <br /> 16 spaces in other areas to accommodate BOCC conditions. He said the Applicant could reduce <br /> 17 the parking spaces from 35 to 20. <br /> 18 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if the maps could be shown again. <br /> 19 Chair Rich said Commissioner Marcoplos proposed going to 20 parking spots, and <br /> 20 reducing the red-hatched area. <br /> 21 Frank Csapo said the Applicant agreed. <br /> 22 Chair Rich asked if the BOCC would accept this compromise. <br /> 23 Chair Rich, Commissioners Bedford, Greene, Marcoplos, McKee and Dorosin indicated <br /> 24 agreement. <br /> 25 Commissioner Price said she will not accept this change. <br /> 26 Commissioner McKee referred to the eastern "knifeblade" portion of the property, and <br /> 27 asked if there is still a 50-foot structural buffer here. <br /> 28 Frank Csapo said this buffer is unchanged. <br /> 29 Michael Harvey said that parcel is zoned Economic Development Hillsborough, and <br /> 30 typically a perimeter buffer would not be required. <br /> 31 Commissioner McKee said he understands, and the Applicant had the buffer in earlier <br /> 32 plans and he just wanted to know if it still intended to have it. <br /> 33 Commissioner Marcoplos expressed thanks for the no idling section, and asked if there <br /> 34 is a plan as to how this will be monitored and enforced. <br /> 35 Frank Csapo said there will be a master regime that will be filed of record that will apply <br /> 36 to this project as a whole, which will entail many of these restrictions and covenants. He said <br /> 37 the property rights will be limited in accordance with these. He said there will be a <br /> 38 condominium-like board tasked with enforcing these regulations. He said as these are <br /> 39 conditions of the zoning, the County can also enforce the conditions. <br /> 40 Commissioner Marcoplos clarified that the repercussions of disobeying these conditions <br /> 41 is a citing by a board. <br /> 42 Frank Csapo said yes, and that board will have enforcement authority. <br /> 43 Commissioner McKee said he appreciated the Applicant's cooperation on Davis Road. <br /> 44 He referred to section 4, item f, and said the he would like to enhance the wording by adding, <br /> 45 "controlled by electronic means, with access to those control units limited to the entities above" <br /> 46 after"gate or bollards." He said he wants to insure that this is not just a manual gate that <br /> 47 remains open at all times. <br /> 48 Frank Csapo said the Applicant is agreeable to this change. <br /> 49 Commissioner Dorosin asked if electronic methods are common in other areas, or would <br /> 50 padlocks and keys be better. <br />