Orange County NC Website
Approved 11.4.20 <br /> 225 If they can't make the meeting at least they had the chance to get their thoughts on paper and we've had a chance to read <br /> 226 them. <br /> 227 <br /> 228 Perdita Holtz: I think Google Groups something we can look into. I know that when it's sent to that group it actually goes <br /> 229 to each of the Commissioners and it goes on the Google Groups site to be archived and we don't necessarily want you to <br /> 230 be getting a hundred emails sent to you. I will talk to IT and find out what options are available. We do anticipate that Bu- <br /> 231 cee's may be on the November agenda so I will work with David and Adam as Chair and Vice-Chair to come up with the <br /> 232 language to be included on the agenda that will detail all this information from tonight. <br /> 233 <br /> 234 Jon Lorusso: I find it troubling, some of the suggestions aimed at limiting input from the public. Things like capping the <br /> 235 amount of time and then everyone else has to send comments. Who knows who is reading those emails? I ignore emails <br /> 236 on a daily basis. Or I already have an opinion and if this doesn't coincide with my opinion, I'm not going to read it. At least <br /> 237 at a meeting I had an impression that people I'm looking at are listening to me. I didn't get that sense at some meetings 1 <br /> 238 did speak at. I think the Board of Commissioners did do it right, they take a list of people at the get go,they cap it at <br /> 239 whoever signed up and if they need to split if over multiple meetings, that's fine. I don't like the suggestion that if you said <br /> 240 something that someone else said,you shouldn't be allowed to speak. Maybe I'm going to say it differently, use different <br /> 241 words that will get through to someone. Maybe I'll say it with more passion or more emotion and it will ring true in your <br /> 242 ears. The suggestion that I said something that someone already said and it is therefore not necessary to speak it again <br /> 243 that doesn't sound fair to me. Not to mention the fact that,why shouldn't I be allowed to say what has been said already, <br /> 244 it's my opportunity to speak. I don't like those ideas, I think if anything,we should be looking for ways to get more and <br /> 245 more people involved and I understand that it is your time and this is a volunteer board and if you allow everyone to speak <br /> 246 and it goes to 11:30 then a lot of people drop off. I have to put my kids to bed right now and I waited to until 7:44 to speak. <br /> 247 As the meetings go later and later, more people drop off and are disenfranchised that way. If you cap it earlier, people are <br /> 248 disenfranchised that way. I think we need to make it so that as many people who want to speak, can speak and not only <br /> 249 that we should be encouraging more and more people from the public. Going back to RTLP there were people who were <br /> 250 in favor of that project who didn't speak because why would they? Really,why are they going to take time out of their <br /> 251 Wednesday night to come speak about something that doesn't bother them or interest them at all. The only people who <br /> 252 are going to speak are the people who are directly influenced by it. But getting more input is always good. There are <br /> 253 things we don't think of that someone's unique view on the world,they raise a point and it causes you to think about <br /> 254 something in a way you hadn't before. I don't think we should be restricting the public input in any way possible we should <br /> 255 be doing everything we can to encourage more and more people to get involved. <br /> 256 <br /> 257 David Blankfard: Do we need to make a motion? <br /> 258 <br /> 259 Perdita Holtz: Maybe you should make a motion because we do want to implement it, potentially,for the next meeting and <br /> 260 not bring this back for you to look at again. Go ahead and make a motion for staff to work with what you gave us this <br /> 261 evening and for us to work with the Chair and Vice-Chair for the language that will be on the agenda for public information <br /> 262 for the November meeting. <br /> 263 <br /> 264 Randy Marshall: You stated it very well in your summary comments so if you state it again, I'll make that the motion. <br /> 265 <br /> 266 David Blankfard: That at the beginning of each meeting,the Board will determine when they plan to recess and take a log <br /> 267 of number of people who want to speak and we will determine who will speak that night,the Board will determine when we <br /> 268 will have a continuance to hear the remainder of the people signed up to speak on the topic. In between those two <br /> 269 meetings anyone who is registered to speak can instead write what they want to say. The final wording will be determined <br /> 270 by Chair and Vice-Chair. <br /> 271 <br /> 272 Carrie Fletcher arrived <br /> 273 <br /> 274 Randy Marshall: So moved. <br /> 275 <br /> 276 Kim Piracci: Clarification, so that means that additional people can't speak at the second meeting? <br /> 277 <br /> 278 David Blankfard: That's correct, you have to be registered at the first meeting. <br /> 279 <br />