Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-05-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:47:58 PM
Creation date
10/29/2020 3:03:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Minutes 11-05-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
35 <br /> 1 Frank Csapo said this will be a master plan development, and there will be an <br /> 2 architectural review committee that will review all plans and aesthetics. <br /> 3 Michael Harvey said it will still be hard to enforce these conditions. He said an <br /> 4 architectural committee means nothing to him. <br /> 5 Commissioner Greene said perhaps it should not be included at all. <br /> 6 Craig Benedict said that would be his opinion as well. <br /> 7 Michael Harvey said there are architectural design standards in the Orange County <br /> 8 UDO, and the Applicant was recommended to address similar compliance points. He said this <br /> 9 does some of that, but the language does not allow him to definitively allow for violations. <br /> 10 Commissioner Dorosin asked if those standards can be imported here to make <br /> 11 determinations. <br /> 12 Michael Harvey said that was a suggestion, and the conditions here were taken from the <br /> 13 application narrative. He said the Applicant took its lead from Settlers Point, but there is some <br /> 14 specificity missing here that was in Settlers Point. <br /> 15 Chair Rich asked if the language from the UDO could be added here. <br /> 16 Michael Harvey said he will work with the Applicant to attempt to improve the language. <br /> 17 Commissioner Price said "harmonious and compatible" is vague and can mean different <br /> 18 things to different people. She said she would like more specificity to aid with enforcement. <br /> 19 Frank Csapo said there are photographic examples in the application materials of these <br /> 20 items. <br /> 21 Chair Rich said the next item is the parking lot layout. <br /> 22 Michael Harvey said the application does not address all the possible permitted land <br /> 23 uses, and if more parking would be needed. <br /> 24 Frank Csapo said the Applicant has addressed this issue, and there is typically too many <br /> 25 parking spaces made with large development. He said these spaces will accommodate the use. <br /> 26 Commissioner Greene said this answer makes sense to her. She asked if"general <br /> 27 office use" can be explained. <br /> 28 Frank Csapo said a typical warehouse building has 5% office occupied space, and that <br /> 29 portion will be built out as office area. He said office square footage would apply to that area, <br /> 30 and industrial square footage would apply to the rest of the open area. <br /> 31 Commissioner Price asked if the Developer knows the breakdown of the property use <br /> 32 percentages. <br /> 33 Frank Csapo said no, but the office space will be minimal. <br /> 34 Chair Rich said she hears a difference between the Developer and staff's description. <br /> 35 Michael Harvey said this is what the Applicant has proposed, and he has no comfort <br /> 36 level on this proposal. <br /> 37 Commissioner Marcoplos said he would favor less parking wherever possible, and to <br /> 38 trust the Developer on this. <br /> 39 Chair Rich said the next issues are setbacks and buffers. <br /> 40 Commissioner Price said she is concerned about setbacks. She said Orange County <br /> 41 already has setback standards, based on a variety of reasons, and asked if the Applicant could <br /> 42 justify its reduction of these setbacks. <br /> 43 Frank Csapo put a map on the screen, and said he does not agree that the Applicant is <br /> 44 not complying with County buffers, as there is a 100 foot building buffer around the south and <br /> 45 west boundaries of the property. He said there are logistical issues associated with the property <br /> 46 that are immutable boundaries that are fixed, and around which the Applicant must work. He <br /> 47 said there is a flood plain, a Duke power easement, and an additional County boundary. He <br /> 48 said given these immutable objects the project must adjust accordingly. <br /> 49 Commissioner Price said she wants to preserve the 100-foot no build buffer. <br /> 50 Frank Csapo said there are no adjacent property owners that have houses near the <br /> 51 property. He said there is a 100-foot building buffer all the way around, and a no build 50-foot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.