Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-05-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 2:58:59 PM
Creation date
10/29/2020 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2020\Agenda - 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
33 <br /> <br />parapet will make the building more visually appealing, and it is not that big a deal. He said he 1 <br />supports 40-45 feet, including the parapet. 2 <br /> Commissioner Price said she is concerned about the scale of the building. She said she 3 <br />wants it to blend in with the surrounding landscape and road scape. She said she wants the 4 <br />conversation to move forward, and she is totally against a service road coming to Davis Road. 5 <br /> Chair Rich said she agrees with Commissioner Marcoplos, and thinks the parapet is 6 <br />important. She said if an opaque buffer can be put in place it would be good. 7 <br /> Commissioner McKee said a 40-foot limit does not mean that solar arrays and HVAC 8 <br />equipment should be seen, but rather the parapet is included in the 40 feet. 9 <br /> Michael Harvey said he would look at these two suggestions with the Applicant. 10 <br /> Chair Rich said to move onto the discussion of Davis Road. 11 <br /> Commissioner Dorosin summarized the current proposal. 12 <br /> Michael Birch said he would like to explain what the Applicant anticipates for this part of 13 <br />the plan. He introduced his colleague Frank Csapo. 14 <br /> Frank Csapo said there is a misconception on what is being proposed. He said great 15 <br />concerns were raised at the public meeting about access to Davis Road, and in response, the 16 <br />Applicant met with staff to issue a revised TIA, in which all the traffic is routed through the 17 <br />service road to old 86. He said NCDOT approved this change. He said the approval received 18 <br />by NCDOT is based on the trip generation report. He said no alternate access points will be 19 <br />needed. He said the Applicant preserved a left out, and right in traffic pattern. He said access 20 <br />to Davis Rd can be restricted to emergency vehicles only, if the BOCC so desires. 21 <br /> Chair Rich said the written condition in front of her does not line up with what was just 22 <br />said. 23 <br /> Frank Csapo said the Applicant thought the BOCC was amenable to small vans and light 24 <br />traffic on Davis Road. He said if this is not accurate, the BOCC can prohibit those types of 25 <br />vehicles on Davis Road as well. 26 <br /> Commissioner McKee clarified that the Developer will accept a condition that states 27 <br />there will be no access to Davis Road, except for emergency vehicles. 28 <br />Frank Csapo said that is correct. 29 <br />Commissioner McKee asked if that would remove item n, o, and p from page 55. 30 <br />Frank Csapo said yes. 31 <br />Commissioner McKee asked if there is a reason these items were included in the first 32 <br />place. 33 <br />Frank Csapo said it was his understanding that the BOCC was open to car and light van 34 <br />traffic on Davis Road. He said if this was a misunderstanding he apologizes, and the BOCC 35 <br />can limit all traffic on Davis Road if it so chooses. 36 <br />Commissioner Dorosin said the Developer has agreed to eliminate the access to Davis 37 <br />Road, and that is a positive step, which addresses many concerns. He said to instruct staff to 38 <br />make that change, and if it is important to leave in emergency vehicles in writing, then do so. 39 <br />Commissioner McKee agreed. 40 <br />Frank Csapo agreed. 41 <br />Commissioner Price asked if a road will still be cut. 42 <br />Frank Csapo said yes, but it will be access controlled. He said the Developer can work 43 <br />with Emergency Services on what is favorable. 44 <br />Commissioner Bedford asked if there is a reason the BOCC has not known about the 45 <br />NCDOT approval prior to tonight. 46 <br />Frank Csapo said the supplemental TIA was submitted to NCDOT about 10 days ago. 47 <br />He said congestion management issued a recommendation for approval of a fully functional 48 <br />signal intersection at service road and old 86. He said based on that recommendation, the 49 <br />developer was issued an approval of the redesign of this intersection on Friday afternoon. 50 <br /> Commissioner Bedford asked if item p on page 55 will be deleted. 51
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.