Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-05-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-05-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 2:58:59 PM
Creation date
10/29/2020 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2020\Agenda - 11-05-20 Virtual Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
32 <br /> <br />Commissioner Greene said this extra height might screen HVAC equipment, for 1 <br />example. 2 <br />Michael Birch said that is correct, anything that is on the roof may be screened. 3 <br />Commissioner Greene said the whole building would be more than 40 feet. 4 <br />Michael Birch said from an appearance perspective yes. He said the Durham Tech 5 <br />building is about 40 feet. 6 <br />Commissioner McKee referred to the roof deck and the parapet shielding things on top 7 <br />of the roof, and said the height from the roof deck will be more than just a few extra feet. 8 <br />Michael Birch said there are several different ways to screen these features, including 9 <br />specialized screenings closer to the units. He said building heights are not typically measured 10 <br />to the height of a parapet. 11 <br />Commissioner McKee said it is thus impossible to know how tall this building will appear 12 <br />from a visual perspective. 13 <br />Michael Birch said that is not the Applicant’s intent. He said the Applicant would be 14 <br />willing to impose a maximum parapet height, if desired. 15 <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if the plan for this evening is for the BOCC to negotiate the 16 <br />parts of this agreement, and the BOCC vote on the item at the end. He said he would like to 17 <br />focus on items within the proposal that Commissioners are unable to accept, and see if there is 18 <br />potential for further compromise. He asked if the BOCC must vote on this item tonight, or can it 19 <br />see a written version of the changes and vote at a later time. 20 <br /> John Roberts the BOCC can vote on approval or denial tonight. He said if the BOCC 21 <br />imposes conditions with which the Applicant does not agree, the BOCC must give the Applicant 22 <br />time to consider the conditions, and vote at a later date. 23 <br /> Chair Rich said she wants to know if there are items within the conditions that the BOCC 24 <br />cannot accept, and focus the discussion on these topics. 25 <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said the building height discussion is important, but precise 26 <br />decisions need to be made, and feedback given. 27 <br /> Commissioner Greene asked is Commissioner Dorosin is asking for a straw vote on 28 <br />each issue. 29 <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said not a straw vote, but if the Applicant proposes a condition 30 <br />either accept, propose an alternative, and move on. 31 <br /> Commissioner Greene agreed, and said not all issues need intimate discussion. She 32 <br />said the building height and truck traffic are big issues, but the entire proposal is a package as a 33 <br />whole, and she would vote no as the proposal currently stands. She said she would like it to 34 <br />come back later. 35 <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if Commissioner Greene could define later. 36 <br /> Commissioner Greene said she would like to go through each of the big issues: building 37 <br />height, traffic, buffers, etc. 38 <br /> Michael Harvey said staff is looking to get direction so that it can work with the Applicant. 39 <br />He said he needs some suggested conditions, and universal consensus is not necessary. He 40 <br />said specifics are necessary, so that he can work with the Applicant to get the BOCC what it 41 <br />wants. 42 <br /> Commissioner Bedford said the BOCC can tackle the more urgent conditions, but it is 43 <br />important to go through every page so that the BOCC can vote yes or no. 44 <br /> Commissioner McKee said he appreciates the comments, and he has specific numbers 45 <br />and conditions that he will, or will not, agree to, on about 10 different items. 46 <br />Commissioner McKee proposed that the building height on Davis Road be 40 feet, from 47 <br />the top of the building pad to the highest structural component on the front façade. 48 <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said if the building is 100 feet off the road with varying 49 <br />topography, he said 40 feet with a 4-6 foot parapet will not make a difference. He said the 50
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.