Agenda - 11-05-20; 8-a - Minutes

Browse Search

28 2. Ordinance amending the Zoning Atlas, as well as imposing development conditions, for 1 the identified parcels as contained in Attachment 3. 2 3 Effect of Denial or Withdrawal: In the event the rezoning application is denied or withdrawn, it 4 should be noted that Section 2.2.8 of the UDO states that no application for the same or similar 5 amendment, affecting the same property or portion thereof, may be submitted for a period of 6 one year. The one year period begins on the date of denial or withdrawal. 7 8 RECOMMENDATION: In the absence of the applicant formally accepting recommended 9 conditions, the Manager recommended the Board continue to review/discuss the project and 10 review imposition of additional conditions. 11 12 If the applicant accepts the imposition of recommended conditions, in writing, by the October 6, 13 2020 meeting the BOCC can approve the Statement of Consistency (Attachment 2), and the 14 Ordinance Amending the Zoning Atlas (Attachment 3). 15 16 Commissioner Price asked if the Town of Hillsborough plans to annex this site. 17 Michael Harvey said there is no plan to annex this property based on the approval of this 18 plan. He said if the site goes over the daily water allotment, then the Town may require 19 annexation as a condition of any additional water and sewer. 20 Commissioner Price asked if the fire department has enough equipment to handle 21 buildings that are over five stories high. 22 Michael Harvey said yes, and the buildings will have to have sprinkler systems 23 throughout, in accordance with state building code. 24 Commissioner Price asked if these buildings will place a greater burden on the fire 25 department. 26 Michael Harvey said this question was asked, and the answer was that it will not have an 27 impact on fire provision and service. 28 Commissioner McKee referred to page 52, section b-1, second paragraph, and said the 29 language is confusing. 30 Michael Harvey said the height limit is 60 feet for the project at large, and those 31 structures fronting Davis Road shall not exceed 40 feet in height. He said there was a repetition 32 of words by mistake, which he corrected. 33 Commissioner Price said she is concerned about the language of “fronting on Davis 34 Road,” and asked what will happen if the front of the building is on an inside road. 35 Michael Harvey said if a building has frontage on Davis Road, even if the front entrance 36 is on an internal street, the height will not be able to exceed 40 feet. He said this language is 37 from the Applicant, and it may be best to speak with them on this matter. 38 Commissioner Price said the County could insure this condition. 39 Commissioner Greene asked Michael Harvey if he could read the second paragraph 40 under “b” the way it is meant to be written. 41 Michael Harvey said the statement should read “no structure shall be erected fronting 42 Davis Road which exceeds 40 ft. in height, above the highest elevation of the adjoining portion 43 of Davis Road, as measured to the roof deck of the building.” 44 Commissioner Greene asked if “the highest elevation of the adjoining portion of Davis 45 Road” could be clarified. 46 Michael Harvey said the Applicant is trying to articulate the fact that parts of Davis Road 47 have higher elevation than the property. He said the goal is trying to avoid an arbitrary 40-foot 48 height limit when the land itself goes up and down. 49 Commissioner Greene said now she is even more confused. She said at first reading 50 she was worried the measurement would be from the highest portion of Davis Road, which 51