Browse
Search
Minutes 09-10-2020 Virtual Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Minutes 09-10-2020 Virtual Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2020 8:24:40 AM
Creation date
10/22/2020 8:09:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/10/2020
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 1 - Additional Discussion on Potential Regulation of the Discharge of Firearms in Areas of the County with High Residential Unit Density
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 2 - Follow-up Discussion on County Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Years 2 through 5
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 3 - Discussion Regarding the Membership Composition of the Planned Committee to Examine the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 4 - Discussion of Travel Policies and Procedures for the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC)
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 5 - Adult Care Home Community Advisory Committee – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 6 - Advisory Board on Aging – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 7 - Affordable Housing Advisory Board – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 8 - Agricultural Preservation Board – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 9 - Animal Services Advisory Board – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item10 - Animal Services Hearing Panel Pool – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item11 - Arts Commission – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item12 - Board of Health – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item13 - Board of Social Services – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item14 - Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau – Appointment
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item15 - Economic Development Advisory Board – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item16 - Hillsborough Board of Adjustment – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item17 - Hillsborough Planning Board – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item18 - Historic Preservation Commission – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item19 - Nursing Home Community Advisory Committee – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item20 - Orange County Board of Adjustment – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> John Roberts referred to map 3, which has one or more units per 1.25 acres, and a final <br /> map shows one or more dwelling units per 2 acres. <br /> John Roberts said the next map is every subdivision in the County and extraterritorial <br /> jurisdiction (ETJ) areas with at least 10 lots in the subdivision. He said staff also looked at 3-lot <br /> subdivisions, which lead to most areas of the County being covered in yellow. <br /> John Roberts said map 6 is the Churton Grove area in Hillsborough, which shows the <br /> largest suburban type density. He said there are several hundred houses; with the north side of <br /> the development surrounded by farms, any of which could potentially host hunting. <br /> John Roberts said map 7 is the Hunts Preserve subdivision south of Chapel Hill, which is <br /> not considered suburban density. <br /> Commissioner Price asked if the information about Durham pertained to Durham City, <br /> County, or both. <br /> John Roberts said that was Durham County's ordinance. <br /> Commissioner Price asked if the ordinance has any jurisdiction in the City of Durham. <br /> John Roberts said no. <br /> Chair Rich said one cannot fire a gun in the city of Durham. <br /> John Roberts said cities have additional legislative authority that counties do not. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if municipalities have the same authority in their ETJs. <br /> John Roberts said no. He said the municipalities can enforce land ordinances in the <br /> ETJ, but any police power would have to come from the County. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin referred to map number 2 and compared it to map number 5, and <br /> asked if the difference between the two could be clarified. <br /> John Roberts said the subdivision map has lots that are not developed, and many of <br /> them will have lots that are larger than the 1/3-1 acre. He said map 2 has more densely packed <br /> subdivisions, but also may be roads along a street and not an actual subdivision. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said the yellow subdivisions have 10 or more lots, and the lots <br /> per acre are between zero and 1. He asked if this is different than one house per acre. <br /> John Roberts said some of the lots will not be developed. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos referred to one of the subdivisions, which is where he lives. <br /> He said they are 10.01-acre lots, and a lot of the yellow ones are one house per 10 acres like <br /> where he lives. <br /> John Roberts said that suggests the key is not accurate. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said the map says if it is yellow, there is zero to one lot per acre. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said zero lots per acre would mean there are no lots at all, and <br /> with 10-acre lots, there are 0.1 lots per acre. He said the key is accurate, but a bit obtuse. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if the County was able to regulate firearms in public parks. <br /> John Roberts said no, that right was taken away about 5 or 6 years ago. He said people <br /> can carry firearms onto playgrounds. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked if cities could regulate firearms in their parks. <br /> Commissioner Greene said no county or municipality can regulate firearms. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said he thinks the Durham ordinance may work well in Orange <br /> County. He said even on a 10-acre lot, if people are shooting it is really loud and if one is not <br /> aware of who it is, it can be a problem. He asked if there is a reason why the Board is tiptoeing <br /> around this distancing. He said 450 feet of no hunting from public buildings is still very close. <br /> He said it does not make a lot of sense. He said it just seems there is a lot of room to put some <br /> serious distances in, and still not violate people's rights. <br /> Chair Rich asked if the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) takes Commissioner <br /> Marcoplos' recommendation to impose a 900 feet boundary, would shooting ranges built prior to <br /> 2016 be exempt? <br /> John Roberts said anything in existence today would not be subject to this amendment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.