Orange County NC Website
ii. Accessory Structures: Water tower shall not exceed 90 ft. 7 <br />c. Setbacks: <br />i. Structures shall observe: <br />1. 100 ft. setback from exterior property lines abutting <br />residentially zoned property; <br />1.2. and the120 ft. setback from Davis Road right-of-way;8 <br />2.3. 50 ft. setback from property exterior lines abutting non- <br />residentially zoned property and the Service Road right-of- <br />way. <br />ii. Vehicular use areas shall observe: <br />1. 50 ft100 ft. setback from exterior property lines abutting <br />residentially zoned property except as defined below; <br />a. Access road/parking area along the western boundary <br />line, adjacent to PIN 9863-53-9059, shall be permitted <br />observing a 50 ft. setback; and <br />1.b. An access road along the southern property <br />line, affording interior access from the Project to PIN <br />9862-99-8894, shall be permitted observing a 50 ft. <br />setback. 9 <br />2. 50 ft. setback for access roads/drives running parallel with <br />Davis Road;10 <br />2.3. 25 ft. setback from property lines abutting non- <br />residentially zoned property and the Service Road right-of- <br />way. <br />iii. Interior lot line setbacks: 11 <br />1. Structures: 20 ft. from all interior property lines; <br />                                                             <br />7 Staff is recommended a 90 ft. height limit for proposed water towers.  The application submittal makes no  <br />reference to any additional use that would need to exceed established height limits.  <br />8 Language suggested/recommended by the applicant to address setbacks for structures erected on the Davis Road  <br />property.  <br />9 The applicant has requested modification of vehicular use setbacks as detailed herein.  In the first instance, the  <br />area adjacent to the Project on PIN 9863‐53‐9059 is heavily encumbered by floodplain and required buffers.  The  <br />applicant suggests allowing for an access road/parking in this area will not impact development on the adjacent  <br />parcel as same is already limited due to the presence of mapped floodplain.  In the second instance, the applicant  <br />is seeking to reduce the required land use buffer to allow for the location of an access road in an area that will  <br />have the least impact on existing floodplain.  If the applicant is required to observe a 100 ft. buffer in this area, the  <br />required roadway crossing could have more environmental impact on the floodplain and floodplain buffers in the  <br />area.  <br />10 Language suggested/recommended by the applicant to address access management issues along Davis Road.   <br />While no parking is intended within this area, driveway access will be necessary.  <br />11 A new condition designed to address BOCC comments from the October 6, 2020 meeting seeking clarification on  <br />internal setback requirements.  <br />16