Browse
Search
BOA minutes 070918
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
BOA minutes 070918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2020 9:25:14 AM
Creation date
10/15/2020 9:24:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/9/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 070918
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 811312018 <br /> public , may not be the basis for location (s) for parking , <br /> granting a variance . additional building area , and <br /> required drive- aisles ; <br /> Re-development of the property <br /> cannot comply with all applicable <br /> land use regulations ( i . e . the 25 fto <br /> setback requirement , required <br /> number of parking spaces , drive- <br /> isle width requirement , etc . ) without <br /> requested relief allowing for <br /> encroachment into the required <br /> setback . <br /> As a result the property cannot be <br /> re -developed and reasonable use <br /> cannot be achieved . <br /> Sec 2 . 10 . 3 (C ) Staff abstract package , Application Yes <br /> The hardship did not result from narrative , copy of original approved <br /> actions taken by the applicant or site plan , and copy of revised site <br /> the property owner. The act of plan denoting re- location of <br /> purchasing property with building . <br /> knowledge that circumstances The hardship relates to the existing <br /> exist that may justify the width of the property , the current <br /> granting of a variance shall not development on the land ( i . e . the <br /> be regarded as a self-created existing structure is already in the <br /> hardship : setback and limits re -development <br /> options as currently oriented ) , and <br /> is based on impacts associated <br /> with the loss of use of an adjacent <br /> private roadway . <br /> Sec 2 . 10 . 3 ( D) Staff abstract package , Application Yes <br /> The requested ,variance is narrative , copy of original approved <br /> consistent with the spirit , site plan , and copy of revised site <br /> purpose , and intent of the plan denoting re - location of <br /> Ordinance , such that public building . <br /> safety is secured and substantial There is existing encroachment into <br /> justice is achieved . the required setback of this <br /> property . The applicant is still <br /> required to abide by applicable <br /> landscaping and buffering <br /> standards ensuring adjacent <br /> property owners will not be <br /> impacted . Reduction of setback <br /> will not adversely impact <br /> development of adjacent property . <br /> 1 i <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Samantha Cabe asked if any public wished to speak . There were no comments . j <br /> i <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.