Browse
Search
BOA minutes 070918
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
BOA minutes 070918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2020 9:25:14 AM
Creation date
10/15/2020 9:24:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/9/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 070918
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 811312018 <br /> 1 Patrick Byker requested to move into record all evidence referred to and provided by the witnesses including all staff <br /> 2 reports and attachments and all testimony into the record . Patrick Byker said he and those who spoke have provided <br /> 3 competent material and substantial evidence into the record . The variance would allow the Churches to complete the <br /> 4 building . He respectfully asked for the board ' s approval . <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Karen Barrows asked for confirmation that Toby Church found out in March that he could not use the driveway . Michael <br /> 7 Harvey answered yes . Karen Barrows said Toby Church had said construction began in March . Michael Harvey said <br /> 8 construction began before notification from the neighbor. The design work and grading had been done for the site <br /> 9 including for the pad . <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Randy Herman said he had a legal question for Mr. Byker. Randy Herman said that under the requirements for issuing <br /> 12 a variance , the first one is that unnecessary hardship would result and it sounds to him that Toby Church gave <br /> 13 testimony that it would cost more . That doesn ' t usually constitute a hardship . Patrick Byker said in this case he believes <br /> 14 it would because the additional cost would be well into six figures and the wording is reasonable use and it is not <br /> 15 reasonable to expect a property owner to spend a quarter of a million dollars either to acquire the driveway or to throw <br /> 16 away the manufactured building and buy another. Randy Herman thanked Patrick Byker for his response . He then a <br /> 17 variance cannot result from hardship created by actions taken by the applicant . One could make the argument that the <br /> 18 owner moving forward with construction without knowing for sure that this access would be granted . He asked for <br /> 19 Patrick Byker to respond . <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Patrick Byker said every party here proceeded in good faith . It was an approved site plan that was reviewed for several <br /> 22 months by the planning department . Everybody offered in faith and reviewed carefully . There were communications that <br /> 23 evidenced ability to access this private roadway . After construction began , that changed . I ' m not here to cast <br /> 24 aspersions , he said , but the fact is it changed . Patrick Byker said Toby Church is a printer and not in the real estate <br /> 25 business or construction business and he just wants to do his job . While it's regrettable , I think it would be unfortunate <br /> 26 to lay that situation at the feet of Mr. Church when he had no reason to disbelieve the information that was in front of <br /> 27 him and before the planning department when the site plan was approved , Patrick Byker said . <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Samantha Cabe asked Michael Harvey to comment . <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Michael Harvey said he wanted to reiterate his testimony . He said the planning department moved forward with the site <br /> 32 plan with the understanding that the use of the adjacent roadway was agreeable . Had we not had that (an <br /> 33 understanding the adjacent roadway along the eastern property line) , we could not have in good consciousness <br /> 34 approved that site plan , he said , At a certain point in time , the use of this private road became unavailable . Michael <br /> 35 Harvey said he has met with this adjacent property owner who controls this roadway and until there was something <br /> 36 officially in writing , these options were exhausted . He and Ms . Church reviewed the list of options and determined that <br /> 37 the only way to meet the building code and land use requirements was to seek a variance . Mr . Harvey reminded the <br /> 38 Board redevelopment of the property is complicated due to existing topography , utility placement, the location of the <br /> 39 existing building , and local and State building code compliance points . <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Samantha Cabe asked if the board has any more questions . <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Michael Harvey reminded the board that staff had prepared a draft script with the regulatory findings . He reviewed what <br /> 44 the staff' s findings are . He reminded the board members that they cannot ask more questions after closing the public <br /> 45 hearing other than consulting with the board ' s counsel . j <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Michael Harvey reviewed the required findings and supporting evidence : <br /> 49 <br /> I <br /> 5 � I <br /> I <br /> 7 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.