Browse
Search
BOH Agenda 082620
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
BOH Agenda 082620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2020 2:14:06 PM
Creation date
10/5/2020 11:33:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOH Minutes of 082620
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Health\Minutes\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair of UNC-CH faculty: "a serious breach of trust"campus not aware of Orange County health recommendation I The Progressive Pulse <br /> Policy Watch has reached out to UNC-Chapel Hill, the UNC System office and UNC Board of <br /> Governors for response to the Orange County health director0s letter. They have not yet <br /> responded. 11 <br /> ChapmanOs letter, in its entirety: <br /> Dear Kevin and Bob: <br /> This morning members of the FEC had the attached letter forwarded to us. We <br /> are completely shocked that such a letter would've been received last week and <br /> that none of us have known about it until now— hours before it has turned up in <br /> the News and Observer. It feels like a serious breech of trust to have kept such <br /> recommendations from the campus community of faculty, staff, and students. <br /> Yesterday, I received word from a faculty member that in student stores, which <br /> was packed, only a third of people there were wearing masks. Just now I <br /> received a video from a citizen who videotaped a line of what appeared to be <br /> sorority women —at least 50—coming out from an indoor, unmasked gathering <br /> at 210 Ransom Street. <br /> These look like off ramps to me. For myself, I am changing my plans to hold a in <br /> in person orientation for our doctoral students tomorrow, and my class that was <br /> planned to be delivered in person will change to remote. I could not possibly do <br /> otherwise in the face of such a letter from our local health department. <br /> Since assuming this role, it has been my intention to interact collaboratively. I <br /> recognize that people occupying roles such as yours are balancing many <br /> competing priorities and, that in the current environment, the choices are very <br /> difficult. However, with outside guidance from public health authorities such as <br /> is included in this letter, to proceed without completely candid discussion with <br /> your faculty, as well as other interested parties, feels like a betrayal. I urge you <br /> to call a meeting of the general faculty immediately and to address the concerns <br /> that are outlined in this letter. Or if you would like me to call it, I will. If the <br /> implications of this letter means that we must send some students home, that is <br /> how it will have to be. If it means bringing this information to the BOG so that <br /> they might grapple with the implications of ignoring these warnings, then by all <br /> http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/...-recommendation/?fbclid=IwAR3_g5um-lYOaaewVNUmTXj3ylfPoSZke-08VcOgnABaraGZ-A1SH1kTDaA[8/6/20, 10:10:37 AM] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.