Browse
Search
BOH Agenda 032520
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
BOH Agenda 032520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2020 1:48:27 PM
Creation date
10/5/2020 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/25/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOH Minutes of 032520
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Health\Minutes\2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 . 3 Detailed response <br /> 2 . 3. 1 Early scientific findings <br /> The scientific discovery that fluoride in drinking water prevents dental caries has been described as a " classic <br /> epidemiological study" .4 It began with studies of a completely different dental condition , now known as dental fluorosis, <br /> and which was first described in the early 20th century as " mottled " teeth and "Colorado brown stain " . By the 1920s, <br /> dentist in the U . S . Public Health Service observed that dental caries occurred infrequently, if at all , in children with <br /> mottled teeth . In contrast, at that time , dental caries was rampant in children unaffected by mottling . With the aid of <br /> the new photospectrographic method of measuring fluoride concentration , new epidemiologic studies investigated the <br /> association between concentration of fluoride in drinking water and dental caries . <br /> 2 . 3. 2 U. S. Public Health Service studies conducted in the first half of the 20th century <br /> The first observational study of an association between exposure to fluoride in drinking water and dental caries was <br /> reported by Dean in 1938 . 31 It compared dental caries of nine -year olds exposed to 0 . 6 - 1 . 5 mg/ L F or 1 . 7 - 2 . 5 mg/ L F in <br /> drinking water, with the analysis limited to continuous residents of the six cities studied . In the primary dentition , the <br /> prevalence of dental caries ( i . e . , children having 1 or more teeth with caries experience ) was 69 percent among those <br /> exposed to the higher concentration compared to 89 percent among children exposed to the lower concentration . In the <br /> permanent dentition , prevalence was 51 percent and 74 percent, respectively . <br /> By 1942 Dean and co - investigators reported associations between dental caries and fluoride using data from 21 cities <br /> where the concentration of fluoride in drinking water ranged from undetectable amounts to 2 . 6 mg/ L F . 32 Dental <br /> examiners also assessed dental fluorosis . When examined ecologically ( i . e . , by plotting community- average levels of <br /> caries and community-average levels of fluorosis ) , the findings identified a range of 1 . 0- 1 . 2 mg/ L F as the " optimal " <br /> concentration at which the occurrence of dental caries was lessened , but without elevated prevalence of dental <br /> fluorosis . Chapter 23 of Burt et a14 summarizes this extensive set of studies, commenting on their strengths, limitations <br /> and implications . <br /> Those association studies provided the rationale for subsequent intervention studies designed to determine if dental <br /> caries could be prevented by adding fluoride to drinking water . The first such study was conducted in Grand Rapids, MI , <br /> where fluoride was added to the public water supply to a concentration of 1mg/ L in 1945 . In that year, epidemiologists <br /> conducted dental examinations of 28, 614 school children , virtually the entire child population of the city at the time . <br /> After fluoridation , they repeated examinations annually for 10 years, selecting samples of children from five school <br /> grades in each year ( i . e . , not necessarily the same individuals from one year to the next) . Five years after fluoridating the <br /> water, mean deft index in the primary dentition reduced by one third in 5 year olds who were continuous residents ( and <br /> who represented 73 % of the population ) . 33 After 10 years, the mean DMFT index in the permanent dentition had halved <br /> in 12 -year-olds . 34 In contrast, over the same period , dental decay levels reduced by less than 20% in samples of <br /> continuous residents of non -fluoridated Muskegon , MI , where Dean and colleagues likewise conducted annual dental <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.