Browse
Search
BOH Agenda 032520
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
BOH Agenda 032520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2020 1:48:27 PM
Creation date
10/5/2020 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/25/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOH Minutes of 032520
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Health\Minutes\2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Expert Evaluation by Michael Waalkes, Ph.D. <br /> Recent studies and systematic literature reviews have stimulated debate about the potential <br /> neurotoxicity of excessive fluoride exposure, possibly indicating that prenatal or early life may be a <br /> sensitive period for exposure. For example, a recent study (Bashash et al., 20172) looked at pregnant <br /> women and their offspring living in Mexico and found that higher prenatal fluoride exposure apparently <br /> caused slightly lower offspring cognitive function (IQ, etc.). In this study (Bashash et al., 20172) fluoride <br /> intake was appraised in both mothers and children by urinary fluoride output, an indirect measure of <br /> consumption with unknown potential confounding factors including diet. In fact, in this study the levels <br /> of fluoride in the drinking water were never actually measured, and, unlike in the USA, in Mexico they <br /> add fluoride to salt for supplementation. The effect on IQ in this study was limited to higher levels of <br /> fluoride exposure. In addition, there was also significant exposure to mercury and lead in the study <br /> population, which are both potentially neurotoxic metals, and there was a lack of information about <br /> arsenic exposure, a neurotoxic element. The authors themselves could not rule out the impact of <br /> unmeasured variables, including total exposure to established neurotoxic agents, on their findings with <br /> fluoride (Bashash et al., 20172). These confounding factors appear to largely limit the usefulness of this <br /> study and it is difficult to translate these findings at high levels to the levels used to fluorinate drinking <br /> water in the US particularly since drinking water exposure was never actually measured. <br /> Systematic reviews are a type of literature review that uses systematic criteria to collect <br /> previously published scientific research studies, and then critically appraises the selected studies, and <br /> finally synthesizes findings into an overall set of conclusions. One such systematic review looked at <br /> human studies of fluoride exposure from the drinking water and how fluoride exposure might impact <br /> neurodevelopmental status from studies carried out primarily in rural China and mostly published in the <br /> Chinese scientific literature and "not widely disseminated" (Choi et al., 20123). The authors indicate that <br /> 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.