Browse
Search
BOH Agenda 022620
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
BOH Agenda 022620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2020 1:35:02 PM
Creation date
10/5/2020 11:16:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/26/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOH Minutes of 022620
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Health\Minutes\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Not all types of in-home water filters completely get rid of toxic PFAS-News-The Fayetteville Observer-Fayetteville,NC <br /> The conclusion is that "their effectiveness varied widely," said Heather Stapleton, an associate professor of <br /> Environmental Health at Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment and a lead researcher in the study. <br /> Reverse osmosis works best <br /> Stapleton said the study,published Wednesday in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, found that reverse <br /> osmosis filters work best. They reduced GenX and other PFAS by 94 percent or more, according to a news release <br /> provided to reporters from across the state who attended a panel discussion at Duke University titled "Safeguarding the <br /> Water We Drink: Understanding the Science Behind Emerging Threats to N.C.'s Drinking Water." <br /> Activated carbon filters, such as those found in refrigerators and pitcher-style filtration systems, on average removed 73 <br /> percent of PFAS contaminants,but the results varied widely. <br /> "In some cases, the chemicals were completely removed; in other cases they were not reduced at all," according to the <br /> release. "Researchers saw no clear trends between removal efficiency and filter brand, age or source water chemical <br /> levels. Changing out filters regularly is probably a very good idea, nonetheless." <br /> In contrast to reverse osmosis filters, Stapleton said in the release, "the effectiveness of activated-carbon filters used in <br /> many pitcher, countertop, refrigerator and faucet-mounted styles was inconsistent and unpredictable. The whole house <br /> systems were also widely variable and in some cases actually increased PFAS levels in the water." <br /> N.C. first to study filters' effectiveness <br /> The study was the first to examine the efficiency of filtration devices in removing a slate of PFAS in homes. Its authors <br /> said the discrepancies in effectiveness and cost may make it harder for people concerned about the contaminants in their <br /> drinking water to know which system best suits their needs and budgets. <br /> "The under-sink reverse osmosis filter is the most efficient system for removing both the PFAS contaminants prevalent <br /> in central N.C. and PFEAs, including GenX, found in Wilmington," Detlef Knappe, an N.C. State professor, said in the <br /> release. "Unfortunately, they also cost much more than other point-of-use filters. <br /> "This raises concerns about environmental justice, since PFAS pollution affects more households that struggle <br /> financially than those that do not." <br /> Knappe, a co-author of the study, called home filters "a stop-gap" measure. <br /> https://www.fayobserver.com/news/20200205/not-all-types-of-in-home-water-filters-completely-get-rid-of-toxic-pfas[2/6/2020 11:49:44 AM] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.