Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-06-20; 6-c - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 10-06-20; 6-c - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 2:20:28 PM
Creation date
10/1/2020 2:58:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/6/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-c
Document Relationships
Agenda 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Minutes 10-06-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> <br />can be found, I urge the member of the Planning Commission to deny this proposal. Please help to protect my family 1118 <br />and my neighbors. Thank you. 1119 <br /> 1120 <br />Beth Rosenberg: Thank you for taking the time to listen to all of us. I know it gets old for you after a while but I think 1121 <br />listening to our concerns and some of our suggestions should prove valuable. I just have a few points to make, first 1122 <br />is that although the Rural Buffer portion of that Davis Road property is supposedly going to be left to be wild land or 1123 <br />whatever, all the traffic from this development now will be exiting onto Davis Road and going through a Rural Buffer 1124 <br />area which seems counter to the purpose of that zoning designation. Another point I want to make is that Mr. 1125 <br />Beeman mentioned that he drove Davis Road and Old 86 and the service road, if that was any time after February or 1126 <br />March of this year, it was during the pandemic and the traffic has admittedly been much less during that time even 1127 <br />through this current period of time because there’s no school traffic currently. Next point is that reading through the 1128 <br />UDO, the purpose of the MPD-CZ zoning is to provide economical and efficient use of land, efficient land use, 1129 <br />improve level of amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety, creative design and a better environment and I don’t 1130 <br />see where this project is likely to provide any of that for us. I, like everybody else tonight, urge you to not approve 1131 <br />this plan and not sent it forward to the Board of Commissioners. Thank you for your time. 1132 <br /> 1133 <br />Declan Cambey: My name is Declan Cambey, I’m 18 years old and I’ve lived in Hillsborough my whole life. I’ve 1134 <br />grown to know all my neighbors, have usual and local restaurants and I’ve walked down the Riverwalk with friends or 1135 <br />into the new Orange County library to check out a new book probably 100s of times. Now both the Riverwalk and the 1136 <br />new library and the development with Paw at the Corner and Whit’s Frozen Custard, these have all greatly improved 1137 <br />my quality of life so I’m all for development that can benefits the members of this community of this town. But from 1138 <br />what I’ve read and what I’ve heard today this proposal for Research Triangle Logistics Park will actively hinder the 1139 <br />quality of life for Hillsborough natives by increasing traffic, noise and pollution while simultaneously destroying 1140 <br />precious green space along Davis Road and along Old NC Hwy. 86 which is a designated scenic byway and houses 1141 <br />many cyclists as has been mentioned. Now I know the applicant team has brought many experts to try to address all 1142 <br />of our concerns but that doesn’t change the fact that this is not what our community wants. I found out about this 1143 <br />meeting on Instagram and this account has 50 followers mostly young folks like myself that I went to school with at 1144 <br />Cedar Ridge. The Facebook group against this industrial park has 386 members and there have been thousands of 1145 <br />signatures on the petition that has been mentioned earlier. On another note, the possibility of jobs is not the promi se 1146 <br />of jobs. As has been mentioned, these developers have not shared any companies or agencies that will set up shop 1147 <br />in this research park. Also, when many traditional jobs are transitioning online why are we investing in warehouse 1148 <br />space that could just be bought over by large companies like UPS and Amazon, this is not a necessary project right 1149 <br />now and I call on the Planning Board to reject its proposal. As a young person, I speak for all future generations that 1150 <br />will suffer if this project is approved. Thank you. 1151 <br /> 1152 <br />Rebecca Drapp: I live off NC Hwy 86. I moved to Hillsborough like others have said for the community aspect of it. I 1153 <br />feel like this is going to destroy our community for all the reasons other people have said, decreasing property values 1154 <br />even when they were given that presentation they couldn’t guarantee that this would raise the property values. I 1155 <br />worry about the quality of life for everyone with the trucks with the big industry. I think the charm of Hillsborough is 1156 <br />the very rural, local businesses that is how we make our community better. That’s according to local businesses and 1157 <br />reinvesting in small places and it sounds like this is just going to be a big warehouse where, I don’t even know if it’s 1158 <br />going to have good quality jobs. I’ll cede because it’s late, thank you for listening. I just wanted to voice my dissent to 1159 <br />this project. 1160 <br /> 1161 <br />Jeb Kelly: I live off Davis Drive, a couple things I wanted to point out that haven’t been mentioned, the developer in 1162 <br />their pitch tonight referenced the 40-year history of planned development here. I don’t think that 40 years included 1163 <br />routing 90% of the traffic onto Davis Drive. In Ms. Greene’s presentation, she referenced the amount of traffic 1164 <br />coming onto Davis Drive as approximately 1600 vehicles a day, I went back and reviewed the TIA from the DOT and 1165 <br />they estimated over 3600 vehicles a day, 90% of that would be about 3100. I think we deserve a little more of an 1166 <br />explanation on the discrepancy there. Ms. Greene also in her own words, mentioned that people will tend to find a 1167 <br />different route of willing to drive further when traffic backs up and that’s exactly our concern. When traffic backs up at 1168 <br />that exchange of 86 and 40, regardless of the signage, they’re going to be looking for other routes, they’re going to 1169 <br />come down Davis, Ode Turner they’re going to head to that 4-way stop at New Hope. They’re going look for other 1170 <br />ways. On top of that there’s a reason that they’re looking at the 40 exchange here, a lot of people are skeptical of the 1171 <br />jobs being created, I think we have a right to be skeptical, I think there’s a lot of jobs would go to Mebane, Burlington, 1172 <br />Durham. I think we’ve be compromising our community here for commuters and I think Orange County Planning 1173 <br />39
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.